Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jun;33(2):96-103.
doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181a33638.

Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first six months of recovery after stroke

Justin A Beebe  1 , Catherine E Lang
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first six months of recovery after stroke

Justin A Beebe et al. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Knowing how clinical tests are related to each other and whether tests are responsive to change are critical to evidence-based practice and sound research.

Objective: To determine (1) relationships between six clinical tests of upper extremity function and (2) responsiveness for each test during the first six months after stroke.

Methods: Grip strength test, pinch strength test, Action Research Arm Test, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, Nine-Hole Peg Test, and the Stroke Impact Scale-Hand domain were administered to 33 subjects within one, three, and six months after stroke. Spearman correlations were used to analyze relationships between tests. Responsiveness was calculated using the single population effect size method.

Results: All tests were correlated with each other with absolute r-values ranging from 0.54 to 0.92 at one month, 0.57 to 0.97 at three months, and 0.41 to 0.97 at six months. All tests were at least moderately responsive to change, with effect sizes ranging from 0.50 to 1.02 from one to three months, and 0.56 to 0.86 (d) from one to six months.

Conclusions: Our data can assist clinicians and researchers in making decisions to use specific tests for measuring upper extremity function in people with hemiparesis in the first six months of recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern SM, Ho M, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lloyd-Jones D, McDermott M, Meigs J, Moy C, Nichol G, O'Donnell C, Roger V, Sorlie P, Steinberger J, Thom T, Wilson M, Hong Y. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008 January 29;117(4):e25–e146. - PubMed
    1. Parker VM, Wade DT, Langton HR. Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. Int Rehabil Med. 1986;8(2):69–73. - PubMed
    1. Bard G, Hirschberg GG. Recovery of voluntary motionin upper extremity following hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1965 August;46:567–572. - PubMed
    1. Feys H, De WW, Nuyens G, van de WA, Selz B, Kiekens C. Predicting motor recovery of the upper limb after stroke rehabilitation: value of a clinical examination. Physiother Res Int. 2000;5(1):1–18. - PubMed
    1. Olsen TS. Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1990 February;21(2):247–251. - PubMed

Publication types