Can simple tests performed in the primary care setting provide accurate and efficient diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia? Rationale and design of the Diagnosis Improvement in Primary Care Trial
- PMID: 19558487
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02092.x
Can simple tests performed in the primary care setting provide accurate and efficient diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia? Rationale and design of the Diagnosis Improvement in Primary Care Trial
Abstract
Effective treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) improves lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and patient quality of life, and reduces the risk of complications arising from disease progression. However, treatment can only be initiated when men with BPH are identified by accurate diagnostic tests. Current evidence suggests that diagnostic procedures employed by primary care physicians vary widely across Europe. The expected increases in BPH prevalence accompanying the gradual aging of the population, coupled with greater use of medical therapy, mean that general practitioners (GPs) are likely to have an increasingly important role in managing the condition. The GP/primary care clinic is therefore an attractive target location for strategies designed to improve the accuracy of BPH diagnosis. The Diagnosis Improvement in Primary Care Trial (D-IMPACT) is a prospective, multicentre, epidemiological study that aims to identify the optimal subset of simple tests applied by GPs in the primary care setting to diagnose BPH in men who spontaneously report obstructive (voiding) and/or irritative (storage) LUTS. These tests comprise medical history, symptom assessment with the International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire, urinalysis, measurement of serum levels of prostate-specific antigen and subjective GP diagnosis after completing all tests including digital rectal examination. GP diagnoses and all other tests will be compared with gold-standard diagnoses provided by specialist urologists following completion of additional diagnostic tests. D-IMPACT will establish the diagnostic performance using a non-subjective and reproducible algorithm. An adjusted and multivariate analysis of the results of D-IMPACT will allow identification of the most efficient combination of tests that facilitate accurate BPH diagnosis in the primary care setting. In addition, D-IMPACT will estimate the prevalence of BPH in patients who present spontaneously to GPs with LUTS.
Similar articles
-
Can benign prostatic hyperplasia be identified in the primary care setting using only simple tests? Results of the Diagnosis IMprovement in PrimAry Care Trial.Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Sep;65(9):989-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02735.x. Epub 2011 Jul 7. Int J Clin Pract. 2011. PMID: 21733048 Clinical Trial.
-
Benign prostatic hyperplasia evaluation and management by urologists and primary care physicians: practice patterns from the observational BPH registry.J Urol. 2011 Sep;186(3):971-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.081. Epub 2011 Jul 24. J Urol. 2011. PMID: 21791352
-
Simple case definition of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia, based on International Prostate Symptom Score, predicts general practitioner consultation rates.Urology. 2006 Oct;68(4):784-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.04.008. Urology. 2006. PMID: 17070353
-
BPH progression: concept and key learning from MTOPS, ALTESS, COMBAT, and ALF-ONE.BJU Int. 2008 Mar;101 Suppl 3:17-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07497.x. BJU Int. 2008. PMID: 18307681 Review.
-
New insights into the epidemiology and natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Prog Clin Biol Res. 1994;386:3-18. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1994. PMID: 7528398 Review.
Cited by
-
Pelvic ultrasound evaluation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: prediction of obstruction.Curr Urol Rep. 2014 May;15(5):403. doi: 10.1007/s11934-014-0403-8. Curr Urol Rep. 2014. PMID: 24658830 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical