Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;105(50):865-70.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0865. Epub 2008 Dec 12.

Quality improvement in postoperative pain management: results from the QUIPS project

Winfried Meissner  1 , Swantje Mescha, Judith Rothaug, Sibylle Zwacka, Antje Goettermann, Kristin Ulrich, Alexander Schleppers
Affiliations

Quality improvement in postoperative pain management: results from the QUIPS project

Winfried Meissner et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Acute postoperative pain management is still far from satisfactory despite the availability of high-quality guidelines and advanced pain management techniques.

Methods: An outcome-oriented project called QUIPS (Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management) was developed, consisting of standardized data acquisition and an analysis of quality and process indicators.

Results: After validation of the questionnaire, a total of 12 389 data sets were collected from 30 departments in six participating hospitals. Improved outcomes (reduction in pain intensity) were observed in four of the six hospitals. The most painful operations, in the patients' judgment, were traumatological and orthopedic procedures, as well as laparoscopic appendectomy. Traditional process indicators, such as routine pain documentation, were only poorly correlated with outcomes.

Discussion: QUIPS shows that outcomes in postoperative pain management can be measured and compared in routine clinical practice. This may lead to improved care. QUIPS reveals which operations are the most painful. Quality improvement initiatives should use as few resources as possible, measure the quality of the outcomes, and provide rapid feedback. Structural and process parameters should be continuously reevaluated to determine their suitability as indicators of quality.

Keywords: QUIPS; benchmarking; postoperative pain; postoperative phase; quality management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
External benchmarking: the results from one’s own clinic are marked for easy identification; the results from other clinics are anonymous. Different outcome measures, surgical disciplines, and time spans can be selected. Analysis results are updated continuously; significant differences are marked. SD = standard deviation; stat. sig. = statistical significance
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in the measure "Maximum pain intensity since surgery" for all six hospitals during the phase funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Stamer U, Mpasios N, Stuber F, Laubenthal H, Maier C. Post-operative Schmerztherapie in Deutschland. Anaesthesist. 2002;51:248–257. - PubMed
    1. Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:534–540. - PubMed
    1. Dahl JL, Gordon D, Ward S, Skemp M, Wochos S, Schurr M. Institutionalizing pain management: the Post-Operative Pain Management Quality Improvement Project. J Pain. 2003;4:361–371. - PubMed
    1. Gordon DB, Dahl JL, Miaskowski C, et al. American pain society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1574–1580. - PubMed
    1. Bardiau FM, Taviaux NF, Albert A, Boogaerts JG, Stadler M. An intervention study to enhance postoperative pain management. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:179–185. - PubMed