Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;2(1):23-6.
doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.51339.

Blastocyst stage transfer vs cleavage stage embryo transfer

Ann M Mangalraj  1 , K Muthukumar, Tk Aleyamma, Mohan S Kamath, Korula George
Affiliations

Blastocyst stage transfer vs cleavage stage embryo transfer

Ann M Mangalraj et al. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of blastocyst transfer in comparison with cleavage stage embryo in a similar cohort of women.

Design: Retrospective analysis.

Setting: University teaching hospital.

Materials and methods: Women aged 35 or less undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection between January 2005 and December 2006 were included in the study. When four or more grade 1 embryos were observed on day 3, extended culture till day 5 was undertaken. This policy was compared with a cohort of women who had at least three grade 1 embryos on day 3 and who had undergone a cleavage stage embryo transfer during the time period of January 2002-December 2004. Primary outcome evaluated was implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate.

Results: Group 1 consisted of 50 women who underwent extended culture and blastocyst transfer. Group 2 comprised of 85 women who had cleavage transfer. The implantation rate for embryos transferred in group 1 was significantly higher than that for embryos transferred on day 3 (40.16% vs 11.43%). The clinical pregnancy rate was also significantly better with blastocyst transfer as compared with cleavage stage transfer (62% vs 29.76%). Significantly fewer embryos were required for transfer at the blastocyst stage compared with day 3 transfer (2.54 vs 3.45).

Conclusion: In selected cases, blastocyst transfer with fewer embryos can be performed with high implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. This policy could lead to a reduction in the incidence of higher-order pregnancies.

Keywords: In vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection; blastocyst stage embryo; cleavage stage embryo; pregnancy rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Jones GM, Trouson AO, Lolatgi N, Wood C. Factors affecting the success of human blastocyst development and pregnancy following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:1022–9. - PubMed
    1. Gardner DK, Vella P, Lane M, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:84–8. - PubMed
    1. Olivenness F, Hazout A, Lelaidier C, Freitas S, Fanchin R, Frydman R, de Ziegler D. Fertilization and early embryology: Four indications for embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:2367–73. - PubMed
    1. Scholtes MC, Zeilmaker GH. A prospective randomized study of embryo transfer results after 3 or 5 days of embryo culture in in-vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:1245–8. - PubMed
    1. Jones GM, Trouson AO. Blastocyst stage transfer- Pitfalls and benefits of extended culture. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1405–8. - PubMed