Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jul;80(7):615-21.
doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1761-5.

[Laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Should an appendix that appears normal be removed?]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Comparative Study

[Laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Should an appendix that appears normal be removed?]

[Article in German]
B Garlipp et al. Chirurg. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

The question whether an appendix found to be macroscopically normal at laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis should be removed remains open to debate. Potential advantages of appendicectomy in all cases include early diagnosis of neoplastic lesions that cannot be detected macroscopically, diagnosis and cure of neurogenic appendicectomy, avoidance of diagnostic confusion in later episodes of abdominal pain, and prevention of appendicitis developing later in life. Therefore, adopting a strategy of always removing the appendix even if it is found to be uninflamed at laparoscopy seems justified as long as it does not imply an increase in postoperative morbidity. We retrospectively studied all patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy in which a "normal appendix" was found and all patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy in our hospital during a 7-year period. Our data as well as a critical review of the literature show that removal of the appendix does not increase morbidity compared to simple diagnostic laparoscopy and should always be done when performing laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer Res. 1990 Dec 1;50(23):7549-51 - PubMed
    1. Int J Surg Pathol. 2008 Oct;16(4):386-90 - PubMed
    1. Med J Aust. 1983 Apr 16;1(8):370-2 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2003 Aug;17(8):1311-3 - PubMed
    1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD001546 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources