Receptivity to Taboka and Camel Snus in a U.S. test market
- PMID: 19564175
- PMCID: PMC2746834
- DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp113
Receptivity to Taboka and Camel Snus in a U.S. test market
Abstract
Introduction: The two largest U.S. cigarette manufacturers introduced Swedish-style low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco (snus) to several U.S. test markets in summer 2006. Since then, snus brands and test markets have proliferated.
Methods: This article assesses consumer response by analyzing data from the 2006 and 2007 Indiana Adult Tobacco Survey (IATS), a statewide telephone survey of 3,544 adults. During those years, the IATS included questions on awareness and trial of Camel Snus and Taboka. Analyses examined rates and predictors of awareness and trial statewide, and within the central Indiana test market.
Results: Nineteen percent of Indiana adults were aware of either Taboka or Camel Snus in 2006 and 2007. Estimates are larger (29%) for central Indiana and larger still (70%) for central Indiana smokers. Trial of snus, however, was very low (1.5% statewide), except among male smokers in central Indiana, 20% of whom are estimated to have tried it. Multivariate analyses showed that trial was more likely among men than women (odds ratio [OR] 13.85), residents of central Indiana than those farther from Indianapolis (OR 2.96), recipients than nonrecipients of tobacco promotions (OR 6.08), and those believing that smokeless tobacco is less harmful than cigarettes compared with those who believe it is equally or more harmful (OR 3.86).
Discussion: Results from this study suggest substantial initial interest in the new products among male smokers in this test market, especially those who receive promotional mailings from tobacco companies, which often include coupons for free or discounted products.
Similar articles
-
Retail promotions and perceptions of R.J. Reynolds' novel dissolvable tobacco in a US test market.Harm Reduct J. 2011 May 15;8:10. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-8-10. Harm Reduct J. 2011. PMID: 21569637 Free PMC article.
-
Snus use and rejection in the USA.Tob Control. 2016 Jul;25(4):386-92. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051342. Epub 2014 Feb 25. Tob Control. 2016. PMID: 24570100 Free PMC article.
-
New and traditional smokeless tobacco: comparison of toxicant and carcinogen levels.Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Dec;10(12):1773-82. doi: 10.1080/14622200802443544. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008. PMID: 19023828 Free PMC article.
-
[Harm reduction strategy in tobacco control].Epidemiol Prev. 2011 May-Aug;35(3-4 Suppl 1):19-32. Epidemiol Prev. 2011. PMID: 21926451 Review. Italian.
-
Smokeless tobacco: a gateway to smoking or a way away from smoking.Biomarkers. 2009 Jul;14 Suppl 1:85-9. doi: 10.1080/13547500902965401. Biomarkers. 2009. PMID: 19604066 Review.
Cited by
-
Intention to switch to smokeless tobacco use among South African smokers: results from the 2007 South African Social Attitudes Survey.PLoS One. 2014 Apr 17;9(4):e95553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095553. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24743334 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Health Warning Labels for Swedish Snus Advertisements on Young Adults' Snus Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions.Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):1371-5. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv140. Epub 2015 Jun 25. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016. PMID: 26116085 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Examining market trends in the United States smokeless tobacco use: 2005-2011.Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23(2):107-12. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050739. Epub 2012 Oct 31. Tob Control. 2014. PMID: 23117999 Free PMC article.
-
Smokers' perceptions of risks and harm from snus relative to cigarettes: A latent profile analysis study.Addict Behav. 2019 Apr;91:171-174. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Nov 14. Addict Behav. 2019. PMID: 30501991 Free PMC article.
-
The scientific foundation for tobacco harm reduction, 2006-2011.Harm Reduct J. 2011 Jul 29;8:19. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-8-19. Harm Reduct J. 2011. PMID: 21801389 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Clark PI, Kim H, Myllyluoma J, Biener L, Giovino G, Marcus S. Retail promotion and pricing strategies for new smokeless, spitless products in test markets. 2007. Presented at Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, Austin, TX.
-
- Cnattingius S, Galanti R, Grafstrom R, Hergens MP, Lambe M, Nyren O, et al. Stockholm: Statens Folkhälsoinstitute; 2005. Hälsorisker med svenskt snus.
-
- Hatsukami DK, Lemmonds C, Tomar SL. Smokeless tobacco use: Harm reduction or induction approach? Preventive Medicine. 2004;38:309–317. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases