Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;11(10):1154-9.
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp113. Epub 2009 Jun 29.

Receptivity to Taboka and Camel Snus in a U.S. test market

Affiliations

Receptivity to Taboka and Camel Snus in a U.S. test market

Lois Biener et al. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: The two largest U.S. cigarette manufacturers introduced Swedish-style low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco (snus) to several U.S. test markets in summer 2006. Since then, snus brands and test markets have proliferated.

Methods: This article assesses consumer response by analyzing data from the 2006 and 2007 Indiana Adult Tobacco Survey (IATS), a statewide telephone survey of 3,544 adults. During those years, the IATS included questions on awareness and trial of Camel Snus and Taboka. Analyses examined rates and predictors of awareness and trial statewide, and within the central Indiana test market.

Results: Nineteen percent of Indiana adults were aware of either Taboka or Camel Snus in 2006 and 2007. Estimates are larger (29%) for central Indiana and larger still (70%) for central Indiana smokers. Trial of snus, however, was very low (1.5% statewide), except among male smokers in central Indiana, 20% of whom are estimated to have tried it. Multivariate analyses showed that trial was more likely among men than women (odds ratio [OR] 13.85), residents of central Indiana than those farther from Indianapolis (OR 2.96), recipients than nonrecipients of tobacco promotions (OR 6.08), and those believing that smokeless tobacco is less harmful than cigarettes compared with those who believe it is equally or more harmful (OR 3.86).

Discussion: Results from this study suggest substantial initial interest in the new products among male smokers in this test market, especially those who receive promotional mailings from tobacco companies, which often include coupons for free or discounted products.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bates C, Fagerstrom K, Jarvis M, Kunze M, McNeill A, Ramstrom L. European Union policy on smokeless tobacco: A statement in favor of evidence based regulation for public health. Tobacco Control. 2003;12:360–367. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark PI, Kim H, Myllyluoma J, Biener L, Giovino G, Marcus S. Retail promotion and pricing strategies for new smokeless, spitless products in test markets. 2007. Presented at Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, Austin, TX.
    1. Cnattingius S, Galanti R, Grafstrom R, Hergens MP, Lambe M, Nyren O, et al. Stockholm: Statens Folkhälsoinstitute; 2005. Hälsorisker med svenskt snus.
    1. Foulds J, Ramström LM, Burke M, Fagerstrom K. Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden. Tobacco Control. 2003;12:349–359. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hatsukami DK, Lemmonds C, Tomar SL. Smokeless tobacco use: Harm reduction or induction approach? Preventive Medicine. 2004;38:309–317. - PubMed

Publication types