Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;19(10):2357-62.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1503-6. Epub 2009 Jun 30.

Cardiac spiral dual-source CT with high pitch: a feasibility study

Affiliations

Cardiac spiral dual-source CT with high pitch: a feasibility study

Dirk Ertel et al. Eur Radiol. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Increase of pitch in spiral CT decreases data acquisition time; dual-source CT (DSCT) systems provide improved temporal resolution. We evaluated the combination of these two features. Measurements were performed using a commercial DSCT system equipped with prototype software allowing pitch factors from p = 0.35 to 3.0. We measured slice sensitivity profiles as a function of pitch to assess spatial resolution in the z-direction and the contrast of structures moved periodically to measure temporal resolution. Additionally we derived modulation transfer functions to provide objective parameters; both spatial and temporal resolution were essentially unchanged even at high pitch. CT of the cardiac region of three pigs was performed at p = 3.0. In vivo CT images confirmed good image quality; direct comparison with standard low-pitch phase-correlated CT image datasets showed no significant difference. For a normalized z-axis acquisition of 12 cm, the corresponding effective dose value was 2.0 mSv for the high-pitch CT protocol. We conclude that spiral DSCT imaging with a pitch of 3.0 can provide unimpaired image quality with respect to spatial and temporal resolution. Applications to cardiac and thoracic imaging with effective dose below 1 mSv are possible.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 May 2;47(9):1840-5 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(2):323-28 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2007 Apr;17(4):994-1008 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2008 Jun;18(6):1188-98 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2006 Feb;16(2):256-68 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources