Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;25(3):282-9.
doi: 10.1002/gps.2334.

Diagnosis and staging of mild cognitive impairment, using a modification of the clinical dementia rating scale: the mCDR

Ranjan Duara  1 , David A Loewenstein, Maria T Greig-Custo, Ashok Raj, Warren Barker, Elizabeth Potter, Elizabeth Schofield, Brent Small, John Schinka, Yougui Wu, Huntington Potter
Affiliations

Diagnosis and staging of mild cognitive impairment, using a modification of the clinical dementia rating scale: the mCDR

Ranjan Duara et al. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of the mCDR, a modified version of the clinical dementia rating (CDR) scale.

Methods: The mCDR is an informant-based, technician-administered, structured interview with multiple choice responses, which does not include objective cognitive testing. Subjects (n = 556) with no cognitive impairment (NCI), amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and dementia were assessed with mCDR, CDR, and neuropsychological evaluation, while medial temporal atrophy (MTA) was measured on MRI scans. The mCDR and CDR were compared with respect to inter-rater reliability, validity, and ability to predict progression in cognitive diagnosis at 12 month follow-up.

Results: The mCDR can be administered in less than one third of the time required to administer the CDR (30 min). Inter-rater reliability (Cohen's weighted kappa) was 0.86 for the mCDR and 0.56 for the CDR. Ability to distinguish between NCI, aMCI, and Dementia subjects, and correlations to memory and non-memory measures were marginally better for the CDR, in comparison to the mCDR. Correlations of mCDR and CDR scores to MTA scores did not differ. Baseline mCDR scores predicted transition from NCI to aMCI, whereas baseline CDR scores predicted transition from aMCI to Dementia.

Conclusions: The mCDR, as compared to the CDR, is briefer and more reliable, and is a valid measure of functional ability among subjects with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and mild dementia. The mCDR should be particularly useful as a reliable and economical instrument for assessing change in functional abilities, especially in multi-center clinical trials and population studies of MCI and mild dementia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Beekly DL, Ramos EM, Lee WW, Deitrich WD, Jacka ME, Wu J, Hubbard JL, Koepsell TD, Morris JC, Kukull WA. NIA Alzheimer's Disease Centers. The National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Database: the Uniform Data Set. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2007;21:249–58. - PubMed
    1. Benton AL, Hamsher K. Multilingual Aphasia Examination: Manual of Instructions. 2nd. AJA Associates; Iowa City: 1989.
    1. Bobinski M, Wegiel J, Wisniewski HM, Tarnawski M, Bobinski M, Reisberg B, De Leon MJ, Miller DC. Neurofibrillary pathology - correlation with hippocampal formation atrophy in Alzheimer disease. Neurobiol Aging. 1996;17:909–919. - PubMed
    1. Chen HH, Duffy SW, Tabar L. A Markov chain method to estimate the tumor progression rate from preclinical to clinical phase, sensitivity and positive predictive value for mammography in breast cancer screening. The Statistician. 1996;45:307–317.
    1. Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc; Hillsdale, New York: 1983.

Publication types