Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Jul;195(1):15-22.
doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.053967.

Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: meta-analysis

Carina Knaup  1 , Markus Koesters, Dorothea Schoefer, Thomas Becker, Bernd Puschner
Affiliations
Review

Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: meta-analysis

Carina Knaup et al. Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Feedback of treatment outcome during the course of therapy (outcome management) is increasingly considered to be beneficial for improving the quality of mental healthcare.

Aims: To review the impact of feedback of outcome to practitioners and/or patients in specialist mental health services.

Method: A systematic search and meta-analysis of controlled trials using outcome management in mental health services published in English or German language.

Results: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria. Feeding back outcome showed a small, but significant (d = 0.10; 95% CI 0.01-0.19) positive short-term effect on the mental health of individuals that did not prevail in the long run. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences regarding feedback modalities. Outcome management did not contribute to a reduction of treatment duration.

Conclusions: Evidence on the effects of outcome management in mental healthcare is promising. More targeted research is needed in order to identify the effective ingredients of outcome feedback and to assess its cost-effectiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer