Survival benefit from early revascularization in elderly patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: a cohort study
- PMID: 19571337
Survival benefit from early revascularization in elderly patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: a cohort study
Abstract
Objectives: To assess if early revascularization offers any survival benefit in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who are > or = 75 years of age.
Background: CS after AMI continues to pose formidable therapeutic challenges in elderly patients.
Methods: We conducted survival analyses of 310 consecutive subjects (including 80 patients > or = 75 years of age) who developed cardiogenic shock after AMI at two study centers - Rush University Medical Center and the John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County (both in Chicago, Illinois). The data were collected over a 6-year period. Where appropriate, we used Kaplan-Meier survival plots, multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling, stepwise multivariate Poisson regression analyses and unconditional logistic regression analysis.
Results: Early revascularization was associated with a statistically significant survival benefit both in patients < 75 years of age (relative hazard 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.59; p < 0.001), as well as in patients > or = 75 years of age (relative hazard 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.99; p = 0.049). This benefit remained significant even after adjusting for the simultaneous effects of several putative confounders. In patients > or = 75 years of age, this survival benefit was evident very early and was sustained all through the period of follow up of the cohort.
Conclusions: These retrospective data suggest a significant survival benefit of early revascularization in elderly patients > or = 75 years of age developing CS after AMI, albeit less as compared to those aged < 75 years.
Comment in
-
Early revascularization for cardiogenic shock in the elderly - has the moment of doubt passed?J Invasive Cardiol. 2009 Jul;21(7):312-3. J Invasive Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19571338 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Changing practice patterns in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: elderly compared with younger patients.Can J Cardiol. 1998 Jul;14(7):923-30. Can J Cardiol. 1998. PMID: 9706277
-
Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 26;341(9):625-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908263410901. N Engl J Med. 1999. PMID: 10460813 Clinical Trial.
-
Routine percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.Am Heart J. 2006 Nov;152(5):903-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.12.030. Am Heart J. 2006. PMID: 17070154
-
Revascularization improves mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.Int J Cardiol. 2014 Mar 1;172(1):239-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.311. Epub 2014 Jan 18. Int J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24462137 Review. No abstract available.
-
Revascularization strategies in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Sep;19(6):647-654. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 9. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018. PMID: 29909948
Cited by
-
Long-term Outcome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared with Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in the Elderly.Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2016 Feb 8;10:11-8. doi: 10.2174/1874192401610010011. eCollection 2016. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2016. PMID: 27014373 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical