Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Sep;24(9):1002-6.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1057-y. Epub 2009 Jul 3.

Adequacy of hospital discharge summaries in documenting tests with pending results and outpatient follow-up providers

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Adequacy of hospital discharge summaries in documenting tests with pending results and outpatient follow-up providers

Martin C Were et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Poor communication of tests whose results are pending at hospital discharge can lead to medical errors.

Objective: To determine the adequacy with which hospital discharge summaries document tests with pending results and the appropriate follow-up providers.

Design: Retrospective study of a randomly selected sample

Patients: Six hundred ninety-six patients discharged from two large academic medical centers, who had test results identified as pending at discharge through queries of electronic medical records.

Intervention and measurements: Each patient's discharge summary was reviewed to identify whether information about pending tests and follow-up providers was mentioned. Factors associated with documentation were explored using clustered multivariable regression models.

Main results: Discharge summaries were available for 99.2% of 668 patients whose data were analyzed. These summaries mentioned only 16% of tests with pending results (482 of 2,927). Even though all study patients had tests with pending results, only 25% of discharge summaries mentioned any pending tests, with 13% documenting all pending tests. The documentation rate for pending tests was not associated with level of experience of the provider preparing the summary, patient's age or race, length of hospitalization, or duration it took for results to return. Follow-up providers' information was documented in 67% of summaries.

Conclusion: Discharge summaries are grossly inadequate at documenting both tests with pending results and the appropriate follow-up providers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study population.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16027454', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16027454/'}]}
    2. Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(2):121–8. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1097/00001888-200512000-00005', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200512000-00005'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16306279', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16306279/'}]}
    2. Solet DJ, Norvell JM, Rutan GH, Frankel RM. Lost in translation: challenges and opportunities in physician-to-physician communication during patient handoffs. Acad Med. 2005;80(12):1094–9. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12558354', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12558354/'}]}
    2. Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):161–7. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '8668084', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8668084/'}]}
    2. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Hamilton JD. Quality in Australian health care study. Med J Aust. 1996;164(12):754. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1001/jama.264.15.1980', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.264.15.1980'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '2214063', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2214063/'}]}
    2. Kosecoff J, Kahn KL, Rogers WH, et al. Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The ‘quicker-and-sicker’ story revisited. JAMA. 1990;264(15):1980–3. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms