Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jul;201(1):111.e1-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.033.

Abdominal cerclage for the treatment of recurrent cervical insufficiency: laparoscopy or laparotomy?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Abdominal cerclage for the treatment of recurrent cervical insufficiency: laparoscopy or laparotomy?

James F Carter et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of traditional abdominal cerclage (AC) with laparoscopic cerclage (LC).

Study design: Eligible women had at least 1 second trimester pregnancy loss due to cervical insufficiency, and had undergone at least 1 failed transvaginal cerclage. A prospective cohort of patients undergoing LC was compared with a historical control group of patients who had AC. A successful primary outcome was defined as delivery of a viable infant with neonatal survival.

Results: We were able to evaluate 19 pregnancies following unique abdominal cerclage placement, 12 laparoscopic and 7 at the time of laparotomy. Nine of 12 (75%) undergoing LC and 5 of 7 (71%) pregnancies undergoing AC successfully delivered a viable infant (P = .63). LC during pregnancy was successful in 4 of 5 (80%) cases as compared to 3 of 5 (60%) cases with AC during pregnancy (P = 1.0).

Conclusion: Operative laparoscopy is a safe and effective alternative to laparotomy for the placement of abdominal cerclage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources