Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a trans-septum suturing technique with conventional nasal packing and intranasal splints in the classic septoplasty operation. The study is a prospective, randomized clinical trial. 114 patients underwent septoplasty for septal deviation and ensuing nasal obstruction. These patients were divided into two groups: packing (using intranasal septal splints and antibiotic meshes at the end of the operation) and non-packing (using four separate trans-septum through and through horizontal mattress sutures without any mesh or intranasal splint insertion). Randomization was performed using the four block randomization system. Patients who failed the regular follow-up were excluded, and the two groups were compared for postoperative bleeding, hematoma, perforation and synechiae. Patients were asked to record pain levels using a visual analogue scale. The authors found no significant statistical differences between the two groups in the parameters studied, but significantly higher pain levels were noted in the patients in the packing group. The final results confirmed that patients who underwent septoplasty, intranasal packing and septal splint insertion did not benefit more than those who had trans-septum through and through suturing.