Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jan;51(1):202-9.
doi: 10.1194/jlr.M900032-JLR200.

Cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers in individuals with and without a CHD event during pravastatin therapy: insights from the PROSPER trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers in individuals with and without a CHD event during pravastatin therapy: insights from the PROSPER trial

Nirupa R Matthan et al. J Lipid Res. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Cholesterol homeostasis, defined as the balance between absorption and synthesis, influences circulating cholesterol concentrations and subsequent coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Statin therapy targets the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis and is efficacious in lowering CHD events and mortality. Nonetheless, CHD events still occur in some treated patients. To address differences in outcome during pravastatin therapy (40 mg/day), plasma markers of cholesterol synthesis (desmosterol, lathosterol) and fractional cholesterol absorption (campesterol, sitosterol) were measured, baseline and on treatment, in the Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk trial participants with (cases, n = 223) and without (controls, n = 257) a CHD event. Pravastatin therapy decreased plasma LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides and increased HDL-cholesterol concentrations to a similar extent in cases and controls. Decreased concentrations of the cholesterol synthesis markers desmosterol (-12% and -11%) and lathosterol (-50% and -56%) and increased concentrations of the cholesterol absorption markers campesterol (48% and 51%) and sitosterol (25% and 26%) were observed on treatment, but the magnitude of change was similar between cases and controls. These data suggest that decreases in cholesterol synthesis in response to pravastatin treatment were accompanied by modest compensatory increases in fractional cholesterol absorption. The magnitude of these alterations were similar between cases and controls and do not explain differences in outcomes with pravastatin treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Plasma lipid and lipoprotein profile (mmol/L) in cases and controls at baseline (A), on treatment (B), and difference (on treatment-baseline) (C). The values for total, LDL-, and HDL- cholesterol are untransformed mean (bar is sd). The triglyceride values are geometric means (bar is SD) calculated from the log-transformed values (except for absolute difference). The absolute change values are untransformed mean (bar is SD) (absolute difference of the raw values).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Change in plasma cholesterol homeostasis marker profile (on treatment-baseline) in all subjects. Values are untransformed mean (bar is SEM) of the ratios of the cholesterol homeostasis markers-cholesterol.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Tertiles of change (on treatment-baseline) in cholesterol synthesis, as reflected by plasma lathosterol concentrations (as a ratio to cholesterol) and percent change in plasma LDL-cholesterol lowering (A and B), triglyceride lowering (C and D), and HDL-cholesterol raising (E and F) in cases and controls, respectively. Bar is 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Tertiles of change (on treatment-baseline) in cholesterol absorption, as reflected by plasma campesterol concentrations (as a ratio to cholesterol) and percent change in plasma LDL-cholesterol lowering (A and B), triglyceride lowering (C and D), and HDL-cholesterol raising (E and F) in cases and controls, respectively. Bar is 95% confidence interval.

References

    1. AHA. 2007. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2007 update. Accessed January 2009, at http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=1928.
    1. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). 2002. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 106: 3143–3421. - PubMed
    1. Baigent C., Keech A., Kearney P. M., Blackwell L., Buck G., Pollicino C., Kirby A., Sourjina T., Peto R., Collins R., et al. for the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators. 2005. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 366: 1267–1278. - PubMed
    1. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. 2002. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of antioxidant vitamin supplementation in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 360: 23–33. - PubMed
    1. Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. 1998. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N. Engl. J. Med. 339: 1349–1357. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources