Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jul 7:339:b2534.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2534.

Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study

Meg Wiggins  1 , Chris Bonell, Mary Sawtell, Helen Austerberry, Helen Burchett, Elizabeth Allen, Vicki Strange
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study

Meg Wiggins et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of youth development in reducing teenage pregnancy, substance use, and other outcomes.

Design: Prospective matched comparison study.

Setting: 54 youth service sites in England.

Participants: Young people (n=2724) aged 13-15 years at baseline deemed by professionals as at risk of teenage pregnancy, substance misuse, or school exclusion or to be vulnerable.

Intervention: Intensive, multicomponent youth development programme including sex and drugs education (Young People's Development Programme) versus standard youth provision.

Main outcome measures: Various, including pregnancy, weekly cannabis use, and monthly drunkenness at 18 months.

Results: Young women in the intervention group more commonly reported pregnancy than did those in the comparison group (16% v 6%; adjusted odds ratio 3.55, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 9.50). Young women in the intervention group also more commonly reported early heterosexual experience (58% v 33%; adjusted odds ratio 2.53, 1.09 to 5.92) and expectation of teenage parenthood (34% v 24%; 1.61, 1.07 to 2.43).

Conclusions: No evidence was found that the intervention was effective in delaying heterosexual experience or reducing pregnancies, drunkenness, or cannabis use. Some results suggested an adverse effect. Although methodological limitations may at least partly explain these findings, any further implementation of such interventions in the UK should be only within randomised trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Comment in

References

    1. Kirby D. Emerging answers 2007: research findings on programs to reduce teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, 2007.
    1. Philliber S, Kaye JW, Herrling S, West E. Preventing pregnancy and improving health care access among teenagers: an evaluation of the Children’s Aid Society-Carrera Program. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2002;34:244-51. - PubMed
    1. Kirby D. Emerging answers: research findings on programs to reduce teen pregnancy. Washington DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, 2001.
    1. Harden A, Brunton G, Fletcher A, Oakley A, Burchett H, Backhams M. Young people, pregnancy and social exclusion: a systematic synthesis of research evidence to identify effective, appropriate and promising approaches for prevention and support. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 2006.
    1. Philiber S, Kaye JW, Herrling S. The national evaluation of the Children’s Aid Society Carrera model program to prevent teen pregnancy. New York: Philiber Research Associations, 2001.

Publication types