Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jul 8;4(7):e6140.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006140.

The status of wildlife in protected areas compared to non-protected areas of Kenya

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The status of wildlife in protected areas compared to non-protected areas of Kenya

David Western et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

We compile over 270 wildlife counts of Kenya's wildlife populations conducted over the last 30 years to compare trends in national parks and reserves with adjacent ecosystems and country-wide trends. The study shows the importance of discriminating human-induced changes from natural population oscillations related to rainfall and ecological factors. National park and reserve populations have declined sharply over the last 30 years, at a rate similar to non-protected areas and country-wide trends. The protected area losses reflect in part their poor coverage of seasonal ungulate migrations. The losses vary among parks. The largest parks, Tsavo East, Tsavo West and Meru, account for a disproportionate share of the losses due to habitat change and the difficulty of protecting large remote parks. The losses in Kenya's parks add to growing evidence for wildlife declines inside as well as outside African parks. The losses point to the need to quantify the performance of conservation policies and promote integrated landscape practices that combine parks with private and community-based measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Combined wildlife population changes for Tsavo East, Tsavo West, Amboseli, Nakuru, Meru and Nairobi National Parks and between 1977 and 1997.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Total wildlife populations for national parks with matching external ecosystem counts.
The parks include Tsavo East, Tsavo West, Amboseli, Nairobi but exclude Meru and Nakuru.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Myers N. Conserving biodiversity - A research agenda for development agencies. Nature. 1993;362:30. - PubMed
    1. Balmford A, Bennun L, ten Brink B, Cooper D, Cote IM, et al. The convention on biological diversity's 2010 target. Science. 2005;307:212–213. - PubMed
    1. Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P, Costanza R, Farber S, et al. Ecology - Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science. 2002;297:950–953. - PubMed
    1. Ervin J. Protected area assessments in perspective. BioScience. 2003;53(9):819–822.
    1. Caro TM, Scholte P. When protection falters. African Journal of Ecology. 2007;45:233–235.

Publication types