Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jul 8:9:222.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-222.

Health - related quality of life of Kuwaiti women with breast cancer: a comparative study using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Health - related quality of life of Kuwaiti women with breast cancer: a comparative study using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire

Shafika A Alawadi et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The Kuwaiti perspective on quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer is important because it adds the contribution from a country where the disease affects women at a relatively younger age and seems to be more aggressive. We used the EORTC QLQ - C30 and its breast-specific module (BR-23) to highlight the health-related QOL of Kuwaiti women with breast cancer, in comparison with the international data, and assessed the socio-demographic and clinical variables that predict the five functional scales and global QOL (GQOL) scale of the QLQ - C30.

Methods: Participants were consecutive clinic attendees for chemotherapy, in stable condition, at the Kuwait Cancer Control Center.

Results: The 348 participants were aged 20-81 years (mean 48.3, SD 10.3); 58.7% had stages III and IV disease. Although the mean scores for QLQ - C30 (GQOL, 45.3; and five functional scales, 52.6%-61.2%) indicated that the patients had poor to average functioning, only 5.8% to 11.2% had scores that met the < or = 33% criterion for problematic functioning, while 12.0% to 40.0% met the >66% criterion for more severe symptoms. Most (47.8%-70.1%) met the >66% criterion for "good functioning" on the BR-23 functional scales. The mean scores of the QLQ - C30 indicated that, despite institutional supports, Kuwaiti women had clinically significantly poorer global QOL and functional scale scores, and more intense symptom experience, in comparison with the international data (i.e., < or = 10% difference between groups). For the BR-23, Kuwaiti women seemed to have clinically significantly better functional scale scores, but more severe symptoms, especially systemic side effects and breast symptoms. Younger women had poorer HRQOL scores. In regression analysis, social functioning accounted for the highest proportion of variance for GQOL.

Conclusion: The relatively high number that met the criterion for good functioning on the functional scales is an evidence base to boost national health education about psychosocial prognosis in cancer. In view of the poor performance on the symptom scales, clinicians treating Kuwaiti women with breast cancer should prepare them for the acute toxicities of treatment and address fatigue. The findings call for the institution of a psycho-oncology service to address psycho-social issues.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Sloan JA, Cella D, Frost MH, Guyatt GH, Sprangers MAG, Symonds MAG. Assessing clinical significance in measuring oncology patient quality of life: introduction to the symposium, content overview, and definition of terms. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:367–370. doi: 10.4065/77.4.367. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steeg AFW van der, De Vries J, Roukema JA. Quality of life and health status in breast carcinoma. Eur J Sur Oncol. 2004;30:1051–1057. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.07.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007. J Expt Clin Cancer Res. 2008;27:32. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-27-32. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. King MT, Fayers PM. Making quality-of-life results more meaningful for clinicians. Lancet. 2008;371(9614):709–710. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60324-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sloan JA, Frost MH, Berzon R, Dueck A, Guyatt G, Moinpour C, Sprangers M, Ferrans C, Cella D. Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. The clinical significance of quality of life assessments in oncology: a summary for clinicians. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14:988–998. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0085-y. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types