Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2009 Jul 8:(3):CD007235.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007235.pub2.

Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery

Vincenzo Berghella et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: Measurement of cervical length (CL) by transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) is predictive of preterm birth (PTB). It is unclear if this screening test is effective for prevention of PTB.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of antenatal management based on TVU CL screening for preventing PTB.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (September 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2008), and reviewed the reference list of all articles.

Selection criteria: Published and unpublished randomized controlled trials including pregnant women between the gestational ages of 14 to 32 weeks screened with TVU CL for risk of PTB. This review focuses exclusively on studies based on knowledge versus no knowledge of TVU CL results.

Data collection and analysis: All potential studies identified as in the search were assessed for inclusion by three independent review authors. We also analyzed studies for quality measures and extracted data.

Main results: Of 12 trials identified, five were eligible for inclusion (n = 507). Three included singleton gestations with preterm labor (PTL); one included singleton gestations with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM); and one included twin gestations without or with PTL.In the three trials of singleton gestations with PTL, 290 women were randomized; 147 to knowledge and 143 to no knowledge of TVU CL. Knowledge of TVU CL results was associated with a non-significant decrease in PTB at less than 37 weeks (22.3% versus 34.7%, respectively; risk ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 1.32). Delivery occurred at a later gestational age in the knowledge versus no knowlege groups (mean difference 0.64 weeks (CI 0.03 to 1.25)). All other outcomes for which there were available data (PTB at less than 34 or 28 weeks; birthweight less than 2500 grams; perinatal death; maternal hospitalization; tocolysis; and steroids for fetal lung maturity) were similar in the two groups.The trial of singleton gestations with PPROM (n = 92) evaluated as its primary outcome safety of TVU CL in this population, and not its effect on management. The incidence of maternal and neonatal infections was similar in the TVU CL and no TVU CL groups.In the trial of twin gestations with or without PTL (n = 125), PTB at less than 36, 34, or 30 weeks, gestational age at delivery, and other perinatal and maternal outcomes were similar in the TVU CL and the no TVU CL groups. Life table analysis revealed significantly less preterm birth at less than 35 weeks in the TVU CL group compared to the no TVU CL group (P = 0.02).

Authors' conclusions: Currently there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening of asymptomatic or symptomatic pregnant women with TVU CL. Since there is a non-significant association between knowledge of TVU CL results and a lower incidence of PTB at less than 37 weeks in symptomatic women, we encourage further research. Future studies should look at specific populations separately (eg singleton versus twins; symptoms of PTL or no such symptoms), report on all pertinent maternal and perinatal outcomes, and include cost-effectiveness analyses. Most importantly, future studies should include a clear protocol for management of women based on TVU CL results, so that it can be easily evaluated and replicated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

References to studies included in this review

    1. Alfirevic Z, Allen-Coward H, Molina F, Vinuesa CP, Nicolaides K. Targeted therapy for threatened preterm labor based on sonographic measurement of the cervical length: a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2007;29(1):47–50. - PubMed
    1. Carlan SJ, Richmond LB, O’Brien WF. Randomized trial of endovaginal ultrasound in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1997;89:458–61. - PubMed
    1. Gordon M, Robbins A, McKenna D, Howard B, Barth W. Cervical length assessment as a resource to identify twins at risk for preterm delivery (clarity study) American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;195(6 Suppl 1):S55.
    1. Ness A, Visintine J, Ricci E, Berghella V. Does knowledge of cervical length and fetal fibronectin affect management of women with threatened preterm labor? A randomized trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;197(4):426.e1–426.e7. - PubMed
    2. Ness A, Visintine J, Ricci E, Boyle K, Berghella V. Use of fetal fibronectin and transvaginal ultrasound cervical length to triage women with suspected preterm labor: a randomized trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;195(6 Suppl 1):S67. - PubMed
    1. Palacio M, Sanchez M, Cobo T, Figueras F, Coll O, Cararach V. Uterine cervical length to reduce length of stay in patients admitted because of preterm labor. Prospective and randomized trial. Preliminary results. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2003;22(Suppl 1):47.
    2. Palacio M, Sanchez M, Cobo T, Figueras F, Coll O, Cararach V, et al. Cervical length measurement to reduce length of stay in patients admitted because of preterm labor. Prospective and randomized trial. Final results. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2006;28(4):485.

References to studies excluded from this review

    1. Beigi A, Zarrinkoub F. Elective versus ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage in women at risk for cervical incompetence. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2005;19(2):103–7.
    1. Kassanos D, Salamalekis E, Vitoratos N, Panayotopoulos N, Loghis C, Creatsas C. The value of transvaginal ultrasonography in diagnosis and management of cervical incompetence. Clinical & Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2001;28:266–8. - PubMed
    1. Lorenz RP, Comstock CH, Bottoms SF, Marx SR. Randomized prospective trial comparing ultrasonography and pelvic examination for preterm labor surveillance. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1990;162:1603–10. - PubMed
    1. Matijevic R, Grgic O, Vasilj O. Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population? Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2006;85(11):1342–7. - PubMed
    1. Owen J, Neely C, Northen A. Transperineal versus endovaginal ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in the midtrimester: a blinded comparison. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;181(4):780–3. - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

    1. Burwick RM, Zork NM, Lee GT, Ross MG, Kjos SL. Cervilenz assessment of cervical length compared to fetal fibronectin in the prediction of preterm delivery in women with threatened preterm labor. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2011;24(1):127–31. - PubMed
    1. Simcox R, Seed PT, Bennett P, Teoh TG, Poston L, Shennan AH. A randomized controlled trial of cervical scanning vs history to determine cerclage in women at high risk of preterm birth (CIRCLE trial) American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;200(6):623.e1–6. - PubMed

Additional references

    1. Berghella V, Bega G, Tolosa JE, Berghella M. Ultrasound assessment of the cervix. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003;46:947–62. - PubMed
    1. Berghella V, Roman A, Daskalakis C, Ness A, Baxter JK. Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2007;110:311–7. - PubMed
    1. Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. BMJ Books; London: 2001.
    1. Gates S. Methodological Guidelines. the Editorial Team. Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Collaborative Review Groups (CRGs)) 2005;(Issue 2)
    1. Grimes-Dennis J, Berghella V. Cervical length and prediction of preterm birth. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;19:191–5. - PubMed