Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Oct;148(4):597-605.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.05.030. Epub 2009 Jul 9.

Diagnostic ability of Fourier-domain vs time-domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma detection

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Diagnostic ability of Fourier-domain vs time-domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma detection

Mitra Sehi et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness assessments and the discriminating ability of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) with that of time-domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) for glaucoma detection.

Design: Prospective, nonrandomized, observational cohort study.

Methods: Normal and glaucomatous eyes underwent complete examination, standard automated perimetry, optic disc photography, TD-OCT (Stratus OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA), and FD-OCT (RTVue; Optovue Inc, Fremont, California, USA). One eye per subject was enrolled. Two consecutive scans were acquired using a 3.46-mm diameter scan with TD-OCT and a 3.45-mm diameter scan with FD-OCT. For each of 5 RNFL parameters, the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was calculated to compare the ability of FD-OCT and TD-OCT to discriminate between normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Results: Fifty healthy persons (mean age, 65.3 +/- 9.9 years) and 50 glaucoma patients (mean age, 67.7 +/- 10.5 years) were enrolled. Average, superior, and inferior RNFL thickness measurements (in micrometers) were significantly (P < .01) greater with FD-OCT compared with TD-OCT in normal eyes (103.3 +/- 12.6 vs 96.3 +/- 10.7, 134.5 +/- 18.6 vs 113.9 +/- 16.3, and 129.7 +/- 16.9 vs 125.5 +/- 15.8, respectively) and glaucomatous eyes (P < .001; 77.6 +/- 17.6 vs 70.4 +/- 18.6, 108.0 +/- 26.8 vs 86.8 +/- 30.2, 82.2 +/- 3.3 vs 73.5 +/- 26.1, respectively). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curves for RNFL thickness were similar (P > .05) using FD-OCT (average, 0.88; superior, 0.80; inferior, 0.94) and TD-OCT (average, 0.87; superior, 0.79; inferior, 0.95).

Conclusions: Cross-sectional peripapillary RNFL thickness measurements obtained using FD-OCT generated with the RTVue are greater than those obtained with TD-OCT and have similar diagnostic performance for glaucoma detection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
illustrates an optic disc photograph (top left) of a right eye with advanced glaucomatous optic neuropathy and diffuse thinning of the neural rim, and corresponding double arcuate scotoma (top right) using standard automated perimetry. Time-domain (bottom left) and Fourier-domain (bottom right) optical coherence tomography images demonstrate diffuse thinning of the RNFL (average thickness 47.25μ and 48μ, respectively), outside 95% confidence limits of age-matched normal subjects. Note that 90-degree quadrantic RNFL assessments using TD-OCT (64 A-scans/quadrant) were generated using an average of three segments; corresponding 90-degree quadrantic RNFL assessments using FD-OCT (250 A-scans/quadrant) were generated using an average of four segments.
Figure 2
Figure 2
demonstrates the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUROC) for the best parameter obtained using time-domain optical coherence tomography (inferior RNFL thickness, AUROC = 0.95) and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (inferior RNFL thickness, AUROC = 0.94, p = 0.45).

References

    1. Greenfield DS, Weinreb RN. Role of optic nerve imaging in glaucoma clinical practice and clinical trials. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:598–603. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin SC, Singh K, Jampel HD, et al. Optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1937–1949. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178–1181. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Velthoven ME, Faber DJ, Verbraak FD, van Leeuwen TG, de Smet MD. Recent developments in optical coherence tomography for imaging the retina. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007;26:57–77. - PubMed
    1. Hee MR, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, et al. Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:325–332. - PubMed

Publication types