Clinical comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty

Abstract

Based primarily on in vitro biomechanical studies, most total knee arthroplasty (TKA) manufacturers have abandoned the all-polyethylene tibial component (APT) in favor of the metal-backed tibial component (MBT). There is little clinical evidence to support this decision. A retrospective review of cemented TKA using the total condylar prosthesis was performed. One hundred eighteen patients with 131 TKAs were evaluated. Sixty-two of these knee prostheses had tibial components made entirely of polyethylene while 69 had the MBT. There were 13 cases of bilateral TKA in which the APT was used for one knee and the MBT for the other. All patients were examined by the authors for an average follow-up period of six years. Hospital for Special Surgery knee scores and a comprehensive roentgenographic evaluation were obtained. No significant difference was noted between the patients with APT and those with MBT, raising serious doubt on the need for the MBT in patients being treated with primary, cemented TKA.