Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;20(1):29-37.
doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2009.04.004. Epub 2009 Jul 10.

Geriatric nutritional risk index as a screening tool for malnutrition in patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis

Affiliations

Geriatric nutritional risk index as a screening tool for malnutrition in patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis

Cheuk-Chun Szeto et al. J Ren Nutr. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition is common among peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Recently, the Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) was found to be a reliable tool for screening malnutrition in hemodialysis patients. However, the GNRI has not been validated in PD patients.

Methods: We studied 314 unselected, adult PD patients from a single dialysis unit. We compared their GNRI scores with their comprehensive Malnutrition-Inflammation Scores (MIS) and 7-point Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) scores. We randomly selected 106 patients for a repeated assessment, and the changes in their three indices were compared.

Results: Baseline GNRI was significantly correlated with MIS (r = -0.487, P < .0001) and SGA (r = 0.234, P < .0001). When MIS >or=6 was defined as malnutrition, the sensitivity and specificity of GNRI <or=93 in predicting malnutrition were 68.0% and 67.7%, respectively. When SGA <or=5 was used to define malnutrition, the sensitivity and specificity were 54.5% and 71.1%, respectively. The change in GNRI was correlated with the change in MIS (r = -0.244, P = .012) and overall SGA score (r = 0.266, P = .006), respectively. When an increase in MIS was defined as a worsening of nutrition, the sensitivity and specificity of GNRI were 45.7% and 81.7%, respectively. When a decrease in SGA was used to define a worsening of nutrition, the sensitivity and specificity were 42.3% and 87.0%, respectively.

Conclusions: Although GNRI is significantly correlated with other nutritional indices, it is not sensitive for screening malnutrition in PD patients. Serial measurements of GNRI are also not sensitive in detecting a change in nutritional status. Further study is needed to identify a simple and reliable tool for the assessment and monitoring of nutritional status in PD patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources