Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec;20(12):1953-8.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp263. Epub 2009 Jul 12.

Prognostic impact of discordance between triple-receptor measurements in primary and recurrent breast cancer

Affiliations

Prognostic impact of discordance between triple-receptor measurements in primary and recurrent breast cancer

C Liedtke et al. Ann Oncol. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

Background: We evaluated discordance in expression measurements for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 between primary and recurrent tumors in patients with recurrent breast cancer and its effect on prognosis.

Methods: A total of 789 patients with recurrent breast cancer were studied. ER, PR, and HER2 status were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or FISH. Repeat markers for ER, PR, and HER2 were available in 28.9%, 27.6%, and 70.0%, respectively. Primary and recurrent tumors were classified as triple receptor-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or receptor-positive breast cancer (RPBC, i.e. expressing at least one receptor). Discordance was correlated with clinical/pathological parameters.

Results: Discordance for ER, PR, and HER2 was 18.4%, 40.3%, and 13.6%, respectively. Patients with concordant RPBC had significantly better post-recurrence survival (PRS) than discordant cases; patients with discordant receptor status had similarly unfavorable survival as patients with concordant TNBC. IHC scores for ER and PR showed weak concordance between primary and recurrent tumors. Concordance of HER2-FISH scores was higher.

Conclusions: Concordance of quantitative hormone receptor measurements between primary and recurrent tumors is modest consistent with suboptimal reproducibility of measurement methods, particularly for IHC. Discordant cases have poor survival probably due to inappropriate use of targeted therapies. However, biological change in clinical phenotype cannot be completely excluded.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan–Meier survival curves for post-recurrence survival stratified for (A) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) concordance versus discordance and (B) all four combinations of TNBC expression in primary tumor and recurrence.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percentages of positively stained nuclei for (A) estrogen receptor (ER) and (B) progesterone receptor (PR) and (C) FISH scores for both the primary and recurrent tumor are plotted. For each plot, the x-axis refers to the primary tumor and the y-axis to the recurrence site. The black lines represent the thresholds for clinical positivity (i.e. 10% staining for ER and PR immunohistochemistry and a FISH ratio of >2.0 for HER2).

References

    1. Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–752. - PubMed
    1. Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:10869–10874. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1275–1281. - PubMed
    1. Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2329–2334. - PubMed
    1. Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5287–5312. - PubMed

Publication types