Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Jul-Aug;7(4):319-27.
doi: 10.1370/afm.996.

Home-based, peer-led chronic illness self-management training: findings from a 1-year randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Home-based, peer-led chronic illness self-management training: findings from a 1-year randomized controlled trial

Anthony Jerant et al. Ann Fam Med. 2009 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Studies suggest peer-led self-management training improves chronic illness outcomes by enhancing illness management self-efficacy. Limitations of most studies, however, include use of multiple outcome measures without predesignated primary outcomes and lack of randomized follow-up beyond 6 months. We conducted a 1-year randomized controlled trial of Homing in on Health (HIOH), a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program variant, addressing these limitations.

Methods: We randomized outpatients (N = 415) aged 40 years and older and who had 1 or more of 6 common chronic illnesses, plus functional impairment, to HIOH delivered in homes or by telephone for 6 weeks or to usual care. Primary outcomes were the Medical Outcomes Study 36-ltem short-form health survey's physical component (PCS-36) and mental component (MCS-36) summary scores. Secondary outcomes included the EuroQol EQ-5D and visual analog scale (EQ VAS), hospitalizations, and health care expenditures.

Results: Compared with usual care, HIOH delivered in the home led to significantly higher illness management self-efficacy at 6 weeks (effect size = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.43) and at 6 months (0.17; 95% CI, 0.01-0.33), but not at 1 year. In-home HIOH had no significant effects on PCS-36 or MCS-36 scores and led to improvement in only 1 secondary outcome, the EQ VAS (1-year effect size = 0.40; CI, 0.14-0.66). HIOH delivered by telephone had no significant effects on any outcomes.

Conclusions: Despite leading to improvements in self-efficacy comparable to those in other CDSMP studies, in-home HIOH had a limited sustained effect on only 1 secondary health status measure and no effect on utilization. These findings question the cost-effectiveness of peer-led illness self-management training from the health system perspective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow of participants through the study. CES-9 = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, 10-item version; HAQ = Health Assessment Questionnaire; HIOH = Homing in on Health; SF-36 = Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36).

References

    1. Improving Chronic Illness Care, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The Chronic Care Model. http://www.improvingchroniccare.org/index.php?p=The_Chronic_Care_Model&s=2. Accessed Jun 21, 2008.
    1. Committee on Quality Health Care in America. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
    1. United Kingdom Department of Health. Saving lives, our healthier nation. http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm43/4386/4386.htm. Accessed Jun 21, 2008.
    1. Stanford Patient Education Research Center. Chronic Disease Self-Management Program. http://patienteducation.stanford.edu/programs/cdsmp.html. Accessed May 15, 2008.
    1. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37(1):5–14. - PubMed

Publication types