Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Jul 16:9:242.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-242.

Beyond traditional surveillance: applying syndromic surveillance to developing settings--opportunities and challenges

Affiliations
Review

Beyond traditional surveillance: applying syndromic surveillance to developing settings--opportunities and challenges

Larissa May et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: All countries need effective disease surveillance systems for early detection of outbreaks. The revised International Health Regulations [IHR], which entered into force for all 194 World Health Organization member states in 2007, have expanded traditional infectious disease notification to include surveillance for public health events of potential international importance, even if the causative agent is not yet known. However, there are no clearly established guidelines for how countries should conduct this surveillance, which types of emerging disease syndromes should be reported, nor any means for enforcement.

Discussion: The commonly established concept of syndromic surveillance in developed regions encompasses the use of pre-diagnostic information in a near real time fashion for further investigation for public health action. Syndromic surveillance is widely used in North America and Europe, and is typically thought of as a highly complex, technology driven automated tool for early detection of outbreaks. Nonetheless, low technology applications of syndromic surveillance are being used worldwide to augment traditional surveillance.

Summary: In this paper, we review examples of these novel applications in the detection of vector-borne diseases, foodborne illness, and sexually transmitted infections. We hope to demonstrate that syndromic surveillance in its basic version is a feasible and effective tool for surveillance in developing countries and may facilitate compliance with the new IHR guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
International Health Regulations 2005 Decision Instrument.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chretien JP, Burkom HS, Sedyaningsih ER, Larasati R, Lescano AG, Mundaca CC, et al. Syndromic Surveillance: Adapting Innovations to Developing Settings. PloS Med. 2008;5:e72. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050072. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buehler JW, Berkelman RL, Hartley DM, et al. Syndromic surveillance and bioterrorism-related epidemics. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:1197–204. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smolinksi MS, Hamburg MA, Lederberg J. Microbial threats to health: emergence, detection, and response. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. - PubMed
    1. New IHR 2005 58th World Health Assembly 2005. Revision of the International Health Regulations. http://www.who.int/csr/ihr/IHRWHA58_3-en.pdf [cited 6/17/08]
    1. Pavlin JA. Asia: Syndromic Surveillance in Asia – Opportunities and Challenges. International Society for Disease Surveillance. Global Outreach Committee Newsletter. http://www.syndromic.org/Gonewsletter_v1_2008.html [cited 6/20/08]