Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Nov;16(11):1348-55.
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.05.007. Epub 2009 Jul 15.

Dual-energy CTA with bone removal for transcranial arteries: intraindividual comparison with standard CTA without bone removal and TOF-MRA

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Dual-energy CTA with bone removal for transcranial arteries: intraindividual comparison with standard CTA without bone removal and TOF-MRA

Boris Buerke et al. Acad Radiol. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Dual-source computed tomography enables bone removal on computed tomographic angiographic data on the basis of simultaneous dual-energy (DE) acquisition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of this technique for the assessment of transcranial arteries. Therefore, the degree of stenosis of the transcranial arteries on DE computed tomographic angiography (CTA) with bone removal was compared to those on standard CTA and time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).

Materials and methods: DE-CTA was performed using a dual-source computed tomographic scanner in 50 patients with suspected cerebrovascular disease. From the source images on DE-CTA, data sets with and without bone removal were reconstructed. TOF-MRA was performed on a 1.5-T scanner. Two blinded radiologists evaluated the segments of the internal carotid artery (C2-C7), the vertebral artery (V4), and the basilar artery for degree of stenosis. A five-step scale (0%-49%, 50%-69%, 70%-89%, 90%-99%, and 100% [occlusion]) for degree of stenosis was applied. Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis.

Results: The degrees of stenosis on standard CTA were consistent with those on TOF-MRA in all segments. In contrast, DE-CTA showed significantly higher degrees of stenosis compared to standard CTA and TOF-MRA in both C2 segments (P < .001). In addition, DE-CTA revealed a significantly higher degree of stenosis compared to standard CTA and TOF-MRA in the left C4 segment (P < .01 and P < .005, respectively). All other segments showed no significant differences of stenosis among TOF-MRA, DE-CTA, and standard CTA.

Conclusions: Compared to TOF-MRA, standard CTA showed similar results. In contrast, DE-CTA revealed significant overestimation of stenosis for segments with close relations to bony structures as well as in calcified stenosis. Consequently, such findings on DE-CTA require confirmation with standard CTA or MRA to eliminate false-positive results.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms