Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;36(6):2324-7.
doi: 10.1118/1.3132273.

Full-field acoustomammography using an acousto-optic sensor

Full-field acoustomammography using an acousto-optic sensor

J S Sandhu et al. Med Phys. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

In this Letter the authors introduce a wide-field transmission ultrasound approach to breast imaging based on the use of a large area acousto-optic (AO) sensor. Accompanied by a suitable acoustic source, such a detector could be mounted on a traditional mammography system and provide a mammographylike ultrasound projection image of the compressed breast in registration with the x-ray mammogram. The authors call the approach acoustography. The hope is that this additional information could improve the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography. The AO sensor converts ultrasound directly into a visual image by virtue of the acousto-optic effect of the liquid crystal layer contained in the AO sensor. The image is captured with a digital video camera for processing, analysis, and storage. In this Letter, the authors perform a geometrical resolution analysis and also present images of a multimodality breast phantom imaged with both mammography and acoustography to demonstrate the feasibility of the approach. The geometric resolution analysis suggests that the technique could readily detect tumors of diameter of 3 mm using 8.5 MHz ultrasound, with smaller tumors detectable with higher frequency ultrasound, though depth penetration might then become a limiting factor. The preliminary phantom images show high contrast and compare favorably to digital mammograms of the same phantom. The authors have introduced and established, through phantom imaging, the feasibility of a full-field transmission ultrasound detector for breast imaging based on the use of a large area AO sensor. Of course variations in attenuation of connective, glandular, and fatty tissues will lead to images with more cluttered anatomical background than those of the phantom imaged here. Acoustic coupling to the mammographically compressed breast, particularly at the margins, will also have to be addressed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The acousto-optic sensor converts ultrasound directly into a visual image. The liquid crystal molecules are initially parallel to the optic axis (labeled n). When exposed to ultrasound they twist through an angle θ, altering the reflectivity of the sensor. Areas exposed to ultrasound then appear bright when exposed to light.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The experimentally measured transfer curve from acoustic intensity (in dB) incident on the AO sensor to optical brightness.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mammographylike ultrasound breast image formation concept. An acoustic source at the base of the figure produces a plane wave illumination of the compressed breast. The ultrasonic transmission is then detected by the AO sensor depicted schematically as the black rectangle at the top of the figure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
To image a target of specified size with good geometrical resolution, the distance L between the target and the sensor must be less than the target size-dependent near field length R. The horizontal line represents the 5 cm thickness of a typical compressed breast. This illustrates that for 3 and 5 mm size lesions located in a 5 cm thick compressed breast, the L<R condition can be achieved anywhere in the breast with ultrasound frequencies of 3 and 8.5 MHz, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Schematics of the solid mass (left) and cystic (right) phantoms used in the imaging studies.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Each figure shows a digital mammogram (left) and corresponding acoustography image (right) for the dense mass (top) and cystic (bottom) phantoms.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures (American Cancer Society, Atlanta, 2008).
    1. Humphrey L. L., Helfand M., Chan B. K., and Woolf S. H., “Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force,” Ann. Intern. Med. 137, 347–360 (2002). - PubMed
    1. Pisano E. D., Gatsonis C., Hendrick E., Yaffe M., Baum J. K., Acharyya S., Conant E. F., Fajardo L. L., Bassett L., D’Orsi C., Jong R., and Rebner M., “Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening,” N. Engl. J. Med. NEJMAG 353, 1773–1783 (2005).10.1056/NEJMoa052911 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosenberg R. D., Yankaskas B. C., Abraham L. A., Sickles E. A., Lehman C. D., Geller B. M., Carney P. A., Kerlikowske K., Buist D. S. M., Weaver D. L., Barlow W. E., and Ballard-Barbash R., “Performance benchmarks for screening mammography,” Radiology RADLAX 241, 55–66 (2006).10.1148/radiol.2411051504 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dines K. A., Kelly-Fry E., and Romilly A. P., “Mammography method and apparatus,” U.S. Patent No. 6,876,879 B2 (April 5, 2005).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources