Physical performance characteristics of spiral CT scanning
- PMID: 1961153
- DOI: 10.1118/1.596607
Physical performance characteristics of spiral CT scanning
Abstract
CT scanning in spiral geometry is achieved by continuously transporting the patient through the gantry in synchrony with continuous data acquisition over a multitude of 360-deg scans. Data for reconstruction of images in planar geometry are estimated from the spiral data by interpolation. The influence of spiral scanning on image quality is investigated. Most of the standard physical performance parameters, e.g., spatial resolution, image uniformity, and contrast, are not affected; results differ for pixel noise and slice sensitivity profiles. For linear interpolation, pixel noise is expected to be reduced by a factor of 0.82; reduction factors of 0.81 to 0.83 were measured. Slice sensitivity profiles are changed as a function of table feed d, measured in millimeters per 360-deg scan; they are smoothed as the original profile is convolved with the object motion function. The motion function is derived for linear interpolation that constitutes a triangle with a base line width of 2d and a maximal height equal to 1/d. Calculations of both the full width at half-maximum and the shape of the profiles were in good agreement with experimental results. The effect of the widened profiles, in particular of their extended tail ends, on image quality is demonstrated in phantom measurements.
Similar articles
-
Dual-source spiral CT with pitch up to 3.2 and 75 ms temporal resolution: image reconstruction and assessment of image quality.Med Phys. 2009 Dec;36(12):5641-53. doi: 10.1118/1.3259739. Med Phys. 2009. PMID: 20095277
-
Dual-slice spiral versus single-slice spiral scanning: comparison of the physical performance of two computed tomography scanners.Med Phys. 1996 Feb;23(2):205-220. doi: 10.1118/1.597705. Med Phys. 1996. PMID: 8668101
-
Evaluation of z-axis resolution and image noise for nonconstant velocity spiral CT data reconstructed using a weighted 3D filtered backprojection (WFBP) reconstruction algorithm.Med Phys. 2010 Feb;37(2):897-906. doi: 10.1118/1.3271110. Med Phys. 2010. PMID: 20229899
-
Image reconstruction and performance evaluation for ECG-gated spiral scanning with a 16-slice CT system.Med Phys. 2003 Oct;30(10):2650-62. doi: 10.1118/1.1593637. Med Phys. 2003. PMID: 14596302
-
Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot.Rofo. 2004 Dec;176(12):1803-10. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813717. Rofo. 2004. PMID: 15573292 Review.
Cited by
-
Spiral CT of musculoskeletal pathology: preliminary observations.Skeletal Radiol. 1993;22(4):253-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00197669. Skeletal Radiol. 1993. PMID: 8316867
-
Intra-individual diagnostic image quality and organ-specific-radiation dose comparison between spiral cCT with iterative image reconstruction and z-axis automated tube current modulation and sequential cCT.Eur J Radiol Open. 2016 Jul 26;3:182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2016.05.006. eCollection 2016. Eur J Radiol Open. 2016. PMID: 27504476 Free PMC article. Review.
-
From computed tomography innovation to routine clinical application in radiation oncology - A joint initiative of close collaboration.Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Feb 8;29:100550. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100550. eCollection 2024 Jan. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38390587 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Cross-sectional vascular imaging with CT and MR angiography.J Nucl Cardiol. 2006 May-Jun;13(3):385-401. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.03.013. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16750784 Review. No abstract available.
-
Use of three-dimensional spiral computed tomography imaging for staging and surgical planning of head and neck cancer.J Digit Imaging. 2000 May;13(2 Suppl 1):24-32. doi: 10.1007/BF03167619. J Digit Imaging. 2000. PMID: 10847357 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources