Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Jul;14(3):219-25.
doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2009.00300.x.

Utility of lead aVR for identifying the culprit lesion in acute myocardial infarction

Affiliations
Review

Utility of lead aVR for identifying the culprit lesion in acute myocardial infarction

Jørgen Tobias Kühl et al. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Lead aVR is a neglected, however, potentially useful tool in electrocardiography. Our aim was to evaluate its value in clinical practice, by reviewing existing literature regarding its utility for identifying the culprit lesion in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods: Based on a systematic search strategy, 16 studies were assessed with the intent to pool data; diagnostic test rates were calculated as key results.

Results: Five studies investigated if ST-segment elevation (STE) in aVR is valuable for the diagnosis of left main stem stenosis (LMS) in non-ST-segment AMI (NSTEMI). The studies were too heterogeneous to pool, but the individual studies all showed that STE in aVR has a high negative predictive value (NPV) for LMS. Six studies evaluated if STE in aVR is valuable for distinguishing proximal from distal lesions in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in anterior ST-segment elevation AMI (STEMI). Pooled data showed a sensitivity of 47%, a specificity of 96%, a positive predicative value (PPV) of 91% and a NPV of 69%. Five studies examined if ST-segment depression (STD) in lead aVR is valuable for discerning lesions in the circumflex artery from those in the right coronary artery in inferior STEMI. Pooled data showed a sensitivity of 37%, a specificity of 86%, a PPV of 42%, and an NPV of 83%.

Conclusion: The absence of aVR STE appears to exclude LMS as the underlying cause in NSTEMI; in the context of anterior STEMI, its presence indicates a culprit lesion in the proximal segment of LAD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Culprit lesions in the main stem of the left coronary artery or the proximal part of the left anterior descending artery cause ischemia in the right upper part of the heart, that is the outflow tract of the right ventricle and the basal part of the interventricular septum. Due to the dominance of the basal ventricular mass, this may lead to ST‐segment elevation in lead aVR. Abbreviations: Cx = left circumflex artery; LAD = left anterior descending artery; LM = main stem of left coronary artery; RCA = right coronary artery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Culprit lesions in the left circumflex artery cause ischemia in the lateral and apical parts of the left ventricle. Hence, the ischemic area is more lateralized than that caused by culprit lesions in the right coronary artery. Hence, ischemia in this region may cause mirroring ST‐segment deviations in lead aVR. Abbreviations: Cx = left circumflex artery; LAD = left anterior descending artery; LM = main stem of left coronary artery; RCA = right coronary artery; S1 = first septal branch of the left anterior descending artery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Myers GB, Klein HA, Hiratzka T. Correlation of electrocardiographic and pathologic findings in posterolateral infarction. Am Heart J 1949;38:837–862. - PubMed
    1. Goldberger E. A simple, indifferent, electrocardiographic electrode of zero potential and a technique of obtaining augmented, unipolar, extremity leads. Am Heart J 1942;23:483–493.
    1. Pahlm US, Pahlm O, Wagner GS. The standard 11‐lead ECG. Neglect of lead aVR in the classical limb lead display. J Electrocardiol 1996;29(Suppl):270–274. - PubMed
    1. Gorgels AP, Engelen DJ, Wellens HJ. Lead aVR, a mostly ignored but very valuable lead in clinical electrocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1355–1356. - PubMed
    1. Staggs SE, Glancy DL. Clinical uses of electrocardiographic lead aVR. J La State Med Soc 2005;157:308–317. - PubMed

MeSH terms