Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Apr;11(4):207-13.
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2009.00098.x.

Results of treatment with telmisartan-amlodipine in hypertensive patients

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Results of treatment with telmisartan-amlodipine in hypertensive patients

Thomas W Littlejohn 3rd et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2009 Apr.

Abstract

This randomized 4 x 4 factorial study determined the efficacy and safety of telmisartan (T) plus amlodipine (A) in hypertensive patients. Adults (N=1461) with stage 1 or 2 hypertension (baseline blood pressure [BP]: 153.2[12.1]/101.7[4.3] mm Hg) were randomized to 1 of 16 treatment groups with T 0, 20, 40, 80 mg and A 0, 2.5, 5, 10 mg for 8 weeks. In-clinic BP reductions were greater with combination therapy than respective monotherapies. The greatest least-square mean systolic/diastolic BP reductions were observed with T80 mg plus A10 mg (-26.4/-20.1 mm Hg; P<.05 compared with both monotherapies). BP control was also greatest in the T80-mg plus A10-mg group (76.5% [overall control] and 85.3% [diastolic BP control]), and BP response rates >90% with this combination. Peripheral edema was most common in the A10-mg group (17.8%); however, this rate was notably lower when A was used in combination with T: 11.4% (T20/A10), 6.2% (T40/A10), and 11.3% (T80/A10).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
 Effect of 8 weeks of treatment with telmisartan (T) 0, 20, 40, 80 mg plus amlodipine (A) 0, 2.5, 5, 10 mg on the change from baseline in the in‐clinic seated trough (A) diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (mm Hg) or (B) systolic blood pressure (SBP) (mm Hg). *P<.05 vs T monotherapy. †P<.05 vs A monotherapy. Data are least‐square mean (SE) values adjusted for dosage, country/region, and baseline blood pressure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of 8 weeks of treatment with the combinations of telmisartan 40 mg (T40) or 80 mg (T80) plus amlodipine 5 mg (A5) or 10 mg (A10) on the unadjusted mean change from baseline in the in‐clinic trough (A) diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (mm Hg) or (B) systolic blood pressure (SBP) (mm Hg) according to baseline blood pressure categories.
Figure 3
Figure 3
 Incidence of peripheral edema (%) in the amlodipine 10‐mg (A10) group compared with combinations (telmisartan 40 mg [T40] or 80 mg [T80] plus amlodipine 5 mg [A5] or 10 mg). *P<.05. **P<.0001 vs A10. Pooled for key combinations.

References

    1. Wang YR, Alexander GC, Stafford RS. Outpatient hypertension treatment, treatment intensification, and control in Western Europe and the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:141–147. - PubMed
    1. Tedesco MA, Natale F, Calabro R. Effects of monotherapy and combination therapy on blood pressure control and target organ damage: a randomized prospective intervention study in a large population of hypertensive patients. J Clin Hypertens. 2006;8:634–641. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weir MR. Targeting mechanisms of hypertensive vascular disease with dual calcium channel and renin‐angiotensin system blockade. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21:770–779. - PubMed
    1. Egan BM. Combination therapy with an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker. J Clin Hypertens. 2007;9:783–789. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Epstein M, Bakris G. Newer approaches to antihypertensive therapy. Use of fixed‐dose combination therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1969–1978. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms