The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth
- PMID: 19616235
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035
The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth
Abstract
Purpose: Treatment decisions for renal malignancies depend largely on qualitative data, including a description of tumor anatomy and the experience of the treating surgeon. Currently characterization of renal tumor anatomical elements is descriptive and lacks standardization. Surgical decision making and data set comparisons would be significantly enhanced by a consistent, reproducible system that quantitates the pertinent characteristics of localized renal lesions. We have developed and propose a standardized nephrometry scoring system (R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score) to quantify the anatomical characteristics of renal masses on computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.
Materials and methods: The nephrometry score is based on 5 critical and reproducible anatomical features of solid renal masses. Of the 5 components 4 are scored on a 1, 2 or 3-point scale with the 5th indicating the anterior or posterior location of the mass relative to the coronal plane of the kidney. We applied the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score to 50 consecutive masses resected at Fox Chase Cancer Center.
Results: The R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score consists of (R)adius (tumor size as maximal diameter), (E)xophytic/endophytic properties of the tumor, (N)earness of tumor deepest portion to the collecting system or sinus, (A)nterior (a)/posterior (p) descriptor and the (L)ocation relative to the polar line. The suffix h (hilar) is assigned to tumors that abut the main renal artery or vein. The nephrometry scoring system accurately classified the complexity of 50 consecutive tumors undergoing excision at our institution.
Conclusions: Standardized reporting of renal tumor size, location and depth is essential for decision making and effective comparisons. The R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score is a reproducible standardized classification system that quantitates the salient anatomy of renal masses. This novel approach for the systematic characterization of renal tumors provides a tool for meaningful comparisons of renal masses in clinical practice and in the urological literature.
Comment in
-
Editorial comment.J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):853; discussion 853. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.134. Epub 2009 Jul 17. J Urol. 2009. PMID: 19616255 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Renal tumour nephrometry score does not correlate with the risk of radiofrequency ablation complications.BJU Int. 2013 Dec;112(8):1121-4. doi: 10.1111/bju.12276. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 24053576
-
Utility of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision-making of the enhancing renal mass.Urology. 2011 Nov;78(5):1089-94. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.035. Urology. 2011. PMID: 22054378 Free PMC article.
-
R.E.N.A.L. Score Outperforms PADUA Score, C-Index and DAP Score for Outcome Prediction of Nephron Sparing Surgery in a Selected Cohort.J Urol. 2016 Sep;196(3):664-71. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.176. Epub 2016 Apr 14. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27091569
-
Predictive Value of Nephrometry Scores in Nephron-sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):490-504. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 24. Eur Urol Focus. 2020. PMID: 31776071
-
Morphometric characterization of kidney tumors.Curr Opin Urol. 2011 Mar;21(2):99-103. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834208d6. Curr Opin Urol. 2011. PMID: 21157352 Review.
Cited by
-
Renal Cell Carcinoma Ablation: Preprocedural, Intraprocedural, and Postprocedural Imaging.Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2019 Nov 29;1(2):e190002. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2019190002. eCollection 2019 Nov. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2019. PMID: 33778679 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is percutaneous image-guided renal tumour ablation ready for prime time?Br J Radiol. 2020 Oct 1;93(1114):20200284. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200284. Epub 2020 Jun 22. Br J Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32543890 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nephrometry score-guided off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and short-time functional results.World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun 21;14(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0914-5. World J Surg Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27329038 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Outcomes Between Partial and Radical Laparoscopic Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Tumors Larger Than Four Centimeters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.World J Oncol. 2024 Aug;15(4):625-639. doi: 10.14740/wjon1866. Epub 2024 Jul 5. World J Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38993256 Free PMC article.
-
Retroperitoneal versus transepritoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for postero-lateral renal masses: an international multicenter analysis.World J Urol. 2021 Nov;39(11):4175-4182. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03741-2. Epub 2021 May 29. World J Urol. 2021. PMID: 34050813
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical