Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;468(1):199-208.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0987-3. Epub 2009 Jul 18.

How successful are current ankle replacements?: a systematic review of the literature

Affiliations

How successful are current ankle replacements?: a systematic review of the literature

Nikolaos Gougoulias et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Total ankle arthroplasty provides an alternative to arthrodesis for management of ankle arthritis. What is the outcome of total ankle arthroplasty implants currently in use? We conducted a systematic literature search of studies reporting on the outcome of total ankle arthroplasty. We included peer-reviewed studies reporting on at least 20 total ankle arthroplasties with currently used implants, with a minimum followup of 2 years. The Coleman Methodology Score was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Thirteen Level IV studies of overall good quality reporting on 1105 total ankle arthroplasties (234 Agility, 344 STAR, 153 Buechel-Pappas, 152 HINTEGRA, 98 Salto, 70 TNK, 54 Mobility) were included. Residual pain was common (range, 27%-60%), superficial wound complications occurred in 0% to 14.7%, deep infections occurred in 0% to 4.6% of ankles, and ankle function improved after total ankle arthroplasty. The overall failure rate was approximately 10% at 5 years with a wide range (range, 0%-32%) between different centers. Superiority of an implant design over another cannot be supported by the available data.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A literature search was performed by two of the authors (NG, AK). We included studies published in peer-reviewed journals reporting on patients with more than 20 TAAs, followed for a minimum of 2 years. Several studies reported results from the same patient population (kin studies) at different intervals and with different numbers of patients; in these cases, only data from the most recent publication were included.

Comment in

References

    1. Anderson T, Montgomery F, Carlsson A. Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses: three to eight-year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1321–1329. - PubMed
    1. Bonnin M, Judet T, Colombier JA, Buscayret F, Graveleau N, Piriou P. Midterm results of the Salto total ankle prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:6–18. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000132407.75881.a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buechel FF, Sr, Buechel FF, Jr, Pappas MJ. Twenty-year evaluation of cementless mobile-bearing total ankle replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:19–26. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000132243.41419.59. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025. Accessed May 18, 2009.
    1. Chou LB, Coughlin MT, Hansen S, Jr, Haskell A, Lundeen C, Saltzman CL, Mann RA. Osteoarthritis of the ankle: the role of arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:249–259. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms