Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul-Aug;124 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):63-73.
doi: 10.1177/00333549091244S108.

Using logic models in a community-based agricultural injury prevention project

Affiliations

Using logic models in a community-based agricultural injury prevention project

Deborah Helitzer et al. Public Health Rep. 2009 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health has long promoted the logic model as a useful tool in an evaluator's portfolio. Because a logic model supports a systematic approach to designing interventions, it is equally useful for program planners. Undertaken with community stakeholders, a logic model process articulates the underlying foundations of a particular programmatic effort and enhances program design and evaluation. Most often presented as sequenced diagrams or flow charts, logic models demonstrate relationships among the following components: statement of a problem, various causal and mitigating factors related to that problem, available resources to address the problem, theoretical foundations of the selected intervention, intervention goals and planned activities, and anticipated short- and long-term outcomes. This article describes a case example of how a logic model process was used to help community stakeholders on the Navajo Nation conceive, design, implement, and evaluate agricultural injury prevention projects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Logic model: theory of change to improve knowledge, attitudes, and safety behaviors related to IPM IPM = integrated pest management RE-AIM = reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance

References

    1. Arcury TA, Quandt SA, Russell GB. Pesticide safety among farmworkers: perceived risk and perceived control as factors reflecting environmental justice. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(Suppl 2):233–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flannery D, Portis M, Adame J. Outreach to migrant farmworkers through a pesticide safety initiative. California J Health Promot. 2003;1:13–35.
    1. McCauley LA, Lasarev MR, Higgins G, Rothlein J, Muniz J, Ebbert C, et al. Work characteristics and pesticide exposures among migrant agricultural families: a community-based research approach. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:533–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCauley LA, Shapiro SE, Scherer JA, Lasarev MR. Assessing pesticide safety knowledge among Hispanic migrant farmworkers in Oregon. J Agric Saf Health. 2004;10:177–86. - PubMed
    1. Quandt SA, Arcury TA, Austin CK, Cabrera LF. Preventing occupational exposure to pesticides: using participatory research with Latino farmworkers to develop an intervention. J Immigr Health. 2001;3:85–96. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms