A randomized, controlled intervention of machine guarding and related safety programs in small metal-fabrication businesses
- PMID: 19618811
- PMCID: PMC2708660
- DOI: 10.1177/00333549091244S111
A randomized, controlled intervention of machine guarding and related safety programs in small metal-fabrication businesses
Abstract
Objectives: Metal fabrication employs an estimated 3.1 million workers in the United States. The absence of machine guarding and related programs such as lockout/tagout may result in serious injury or death. The purpose of this study was to improve machine-related safety in small metal-fabrication businesses.
Methods: We used a randomized trial with two groups: management only and management-employee. We evaluated businesses for the adequacy of machine guarding (machine scorecard) and related safety programs (safety audit). We provided all businesses with a report outlining deficiencies and prioritizing their remediation. In addition, the management-employee group received four one-hour interactive training sessions from a peer educator.
Results: We evaluated 40 metal-fabrication businesses at baseline and 37 (93%) one year later. Of the three nonparticipants, two had gone out of business. More than 40% of devices required for adequate guarding were missing or inadequate, and 35% of required safety programs and practices were absent at baseline. Both measures improved significantly during the course of the intervention. No significant differences in changes occurred between the two intervention groups. Machine-guarding practices and programs improved by up to 13% and safety audit scores by up to 23%. Businesses that added safety committees or those that started with the lowest baseline measures showed the greatest improvements.
Conclusions: Simple and easy-to-use assessment tools allowed businesses to significantly improve their safety practices, and safety committees facilitated this process.
Similar articles
-
Findings From the National Machine Guarding Program: Safety Climate, Hazard Assessment, and Safety Leadership in Small Metal Fabrication Businesses.J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Dec;59(12):1172-1179. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001166. J Occup Environ Med. 2017. PMID: 28930801 Free PMC article.
-
Findings From the National Machine Guarding Program-A Small Business Intervention: Machine Safety.J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Sep;58(9):885-91. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000836. J Occup Environ Med. 2016. PMID: 27466709 Free PMC article.
-
Profile of machine safety in small metal fabrication businesses.Am J Ind Med. 2006 May;49(5):352-9. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20294. Am J Ind Med. 2006. PMID: 16526065
-
Optimum machine guarding.Occup Health Saf. 1997 Dec;66(12):37-40. Occup Health Saf. 1997. PMID: 9825538 Review. No abstract available.
-
Evaluation of an Occupational Safety and Health Training for Cannabis Cultivation Workers.Ann Work Expo Health. 2020 Aug 6;64(7):765-769. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa026. Ann Work Expo Health. 2020. PMID: 32185387 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Development of an indoor air quality checklist for risk assessment of indoor air pollutants by semiquantitative score in nonindustrial workplaces.Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2012;5:17-23. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S26567. Epub 2012 Apr 13. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2012. PMID: 22570579 Free PMC article.
-
National Machine Guarding Program: Part 2. Safety management in small metal fabrication enterprises.Am J Ind Med. 2015 Nov;58(11):1184-93. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22523. Epub 2015 Sep 8. Am J Ind Med. 2015. PMID: 26345591 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions: advancing the state of the art.Public Health Rep. 2009 Jul-Aug;124 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-3. doi: 10.1177/00333549091244S101. Public Health Rep. 2009. PMID: 19618801 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Findings From the National Machine Guarding Program: Safety Climate, Hazard Assessment, and Safety Leadership in Small Metal Fabrication Businesses.J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Dec;59(12):1172-1179. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001166. J Occup Environ Med. 2017. PMID: 28930801 Free PMC article.
-
Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 1;18(2):e1234. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1234. eCollection 2022 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36911341 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (US) Cincinnati: NIOSH; 1988. National occupational exposure survey analysis of management interview responses. DHHS/NIOSH Publication No. 89-103.
-
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (US) Cincinnati: NIOSH; 1999. [cited 2004 Nov 17]. Identifying high-risk small business industries: the basis for preventing occupational injury, illness, and fatality. DHHS/NIOSH Publication No. 99-107. Also available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/pdfs/99-107.pdf.
-
- Barbeau E, Roelofs C, Youngstrom R, Sorensen G, Stoddard A, LaMontagne AD. Assessment of occupational safety and health programs in small businesses. Am J Ind Med. 2004;45:371–9. - PubMed
-
- U.S. Small Business Association. Employer firms, and employment by size of firm, by NAICS codes, 2004.
-
- Census Bureau (US) [cited 2007 Feb 19];Industry statistics sampler: NAICS 332: fabricated metal product manufacturing. Available from: URL: http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/data/industry/E332.htm.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical