Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul-Aug;124 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):169-79.
doi: 10.1177/00333549091244S119.

Hands-free technique in the operating room: reduction in body fluid exposure and the value of a training video

Bernadette Stringer  1 , Ted Haines, Charles H Goldsmith, Jennifer Blythe, Ramon Berguer, Joel Andersen, Christopher J De Gara
Affiliations

Hands-free technique in the operating room: reduction in body fluid exposure and the value of a training video

Bernadette Stringer et al. Public Health Rep. 2009 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to determine if (1) using a hands-free technique (HFT)--whereby no two surgical team members touch the same sharp item simultaneously--> or = 75% of the time reduced the rate of percutaneous injury, glove tear, and contamination (incidents); and (2) if a video-based intervention increased HFT use to > or = 75%, immediately and over time.

Methods: During three and four periods, in three intervention and three control hospitals, respectively, nurses recorded incidents, percentage of HFT use, and other information in 10,596 surgeries. The video was shown in intervention hospitals between Periods 1 and 2, and in control hospitals between Periods 3 and 4. HFT, considered used when > or = 75% passes were done hands-free, was practiced in 35% of all surgeries. We applied logistic regression to (1) estimate the rate reduction for incidents in surgeries when the HFT was used and not used, while adjusting for potential risk factors, and (2) estimate HFT use of about 75% and 100%, in intervention compared with control hospitals, in Period 2 compared with Period 1, and Period 3 compared with Period 2.

Results: A total of 202 incidents (49 injuries, 125 glove tears, and 28 contaminations) were reported. Adjusted for differences in surgical type, length, emergency status, blood loss, time of day, and number of personnel present for > or = 75% of the surgery, the HFT-associated reduction in rate was 35%. An increase in use of HFT of > or = 75% was significantly greater in intervention hospitals, during the first post-intervention period, and was sustained five months later.

Conclusion: The use of HFT and the HFT video were both found to be effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Pre/post hands-free technique intervention study in six hospitals in Canada
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fry DE. Occupational risks of blood exposure in the operating room. Am Surg. 2007;73:637–46. - PubMed
    1. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (US) Standard interpretations: the use of safety-engineered devices and work practice controls in operating rooms; hospital responsibility to protect independent practitioners under BBP standard. [cited 2008 Aug 28];2007 Available from: URL: http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETA....
    1. Association of Operating Room Nurses. Recommended practices for standard and transmission-based precautions in the perioperative practice setting. AORN J. 1999;69:404–6. - PubMed
    1. American College of Surgeons. Statement on sharps safety. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2007;92:34–7. - PubMed
    1. St.Germaine RL, Hanson J, de Gara CJ. Double gloving and practice attitudes among surgeons. Am J Surg. 2003;185:141–5. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms