Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul 20:9:14.
doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-9-14.

Factors associated with attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women: a comparative analysis of 17 sub-Saharan countries

Affiliations

Factors associated with attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women: a comparative analysis of 17 sub-Saharan countries

Olalekan A Uthman et al. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. .

Abstract

Background: Violence against women, especially by intimate partners, is a serious public health problem that is associated with physical, reproductive and mental health consequences. Even though most societies proscribe violence against women, the reality is that violations against women's rights are often sanctioned under the garb of cultural practices and norms, or through misinterpretation of religious tenets.

Methods: We utilised data from 17 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted between 2003 and 2007 in sub-Saharan Africa to assess the net effects of socio-demographic factors on men's and women's attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) using multiple logistic regression models estimated by likelihood ratio test.

Results: IPVAW was widely accepted under certain circumstances by men and women in all the countries studied. Women were more likely to justify IPVAW than men. "Neglecting the children" was the most common reason agreed to by both women and men for justifying IPVAW followed by "going out without informing husband" and "arguing back with the husband". Increasing wealth status, education attainment, urbanization, access to media, and joint decision making were associated with decreased odds of justifying IPVAW in most countries.

Conclusion: In most Sub-Saharan African countries studied where IPVAW is widely accepted as a response to women's transgressing gender norms, men find less justification for the practice than do women. The present study suggests that proactive efforts are needed to change these norms, such as promotion of higher education and socio-demographic development. The magnitude and direction of factors associated with attitudes towards IPVAW varies widely across the countries, thus suggesting the significance of capitalizing on need-adapted interventions tailored to fit conditions in each country.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of women who believe that IPVAW is justified, by different scenarios.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of men who believe that IPVAW is justified, by different scenarios.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sex-difference in attitude toward IPVAW of 17 sub-Saharan countries.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot showing pooled odds ratio and 99% confidence for socio-demographic factors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ofei-aboagye RO. Domestic violence in Ghana: an initial step. Columbia J Gend Law. 1994;4(1):1–25. - PubMed
    1. Okemgbo CN, Omideyi AK, Odimegwu CO. Prevalence, patterns and correlates of domestic violence in selected Igbo communities of Imo State, Nigeria. African journal of reproductive health. 2002;6(2):101–114. doi: 10.2307/3583136. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kiragu J. Policy review: HIV prevention and women's rights: working for one means working for both. AIDS Captions. 1995;2(3):40–46. - PubMed
    1. Rivera Izabal LM. Women's legal knowledge: a case study of Mexican urban dwellers. Gend Dev. 1995;3(2):43–48. doi: 10.1080/741921808. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oyediran KA, Isiugo-Abanihe U. Perceptions of Nigerian women on domestic violence: evidence from 2003 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey. African journal of reproductive health. 2005;9(2):38–53. - PubMed