Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Mar;7(1):75-86.
doi: 10.1017/S1478951509000108.

The project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial to improve palliative care for rural patients with advanced cancer: baseline findings, methodological challenges, and solutions

Marie Bakitas  1 , Kathleen Doyle Lyons, Mark T Hegel, Stefan Balan, Kathleen N Barnett, Frances C Brokaw, Ira R Byock, Jay G Hull, Zhongze Li, Elizabeth McKinstry, Janette L Seville, Tim A Ahles
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial to improve palliative care for rural patients with advanced cancer: baseline findings, methodological challenges, and solutions

Marie Bakitas et al. Palliat Support Care. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: There is a paucity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate models of palliative care. Although interventions vary, all have faced a variety of methodological challenges including adequate recruitment, missing data, and contamination of the control group. We describe the ENABLE II intervention, methods, and sample baseline characteristics to increase intervention and methodological transparency, and to describe our solutions to selected methodological issues.

Methods: Half of the participants recruited from our rural U.S. comprehensive cancer center and affiliated clinics were randomly assigned to a phone-based, nurse-led educational, care coordination palliative care intervention model. Intervention services were provided to half of the participants weekly for the first month and then monthly until death, including bereavement follow-up call to the caregiver. The other half of the participants were assigned to care as usual. Symptoms, quality of life, mood, and functional status were assessed every 3 months until death.

Results: Baseline data of 279 participants were similar to normative samples. Solutions to methodological challenges of recruitment, missing data, and "usual care" control group contamination are described.

Significance of results: It is feasible to overcome many of the methodological challenges to conducting a rigorous palliative care RCT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2007. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2007.
    1. Bakitas M, Ahles T, Skalla K, Brokaw F, Byock I, Hanscom B, et al. Proxy perspectives on end-of-life care. Cancer. 2008 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakitas M, Lyons KD, Dixon J, Ahles T. Palliative Care Program Effectiveness Research: Developing rigor in sampling design, conduct and reporting. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2006;31(3):270–284. - PubMed
    1. Bakitas M, Stevens M, Ahles T, Kirn M, Skalla K, Kane N, et al. Project ENABLE: A palliative care demonstration project for advanced cancer patients in three settings. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2004;7(2):363–372. - PubMed
    1. Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, et al. Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy - Breast Quality-of-Life instrument. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1997;15(3):974–986. - PubMed

Publication types