SCORE Study report 3: study design and baseline characteristics
- PMID: 19619896
- PMCID: PMC2785028
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.022
SCORE Study report 3: study design and baseline characteristics
Abstract
Objective: To describe the baseline characteristics of the participants in the Standard Care versus COrticosteroid for REtinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) Study and to compare with cohorts from other retinal vein occlusion trials. The design of the SCORE Study is also described.
Design: Two, multicenter, Phase III, randomized clinical trials, one involving participants with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and one involving participants with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
Participants: A total of 682 participants, including 271 with CRVO and 411 with BRVO.
Methods: Demographic and study eye characteristics are summarized and compared between the CRVO and BRVO study participants.
Main outcome measures: Baseline ophthalmic characteristics, including visual acuity and duration of macular edema before enrollment, and medical history characteristics, including diabetes mellitus and hypertension.
Results: In the CRVO trial, at baseline, mean visual acuity letter score was 51 ( approximately 20/100), mean optical coherence tomography (OCT)-measured central subfield thickness was 595 microns, mean area of retinal thickening in the macular grid on color photography was 12.3 disc areas (DA), and mean area of fluorescein leakage was 11.0 DA. In the BRVO trial, at baseline, mean visual acuity letter score was 57 ( approximately 20/80), mean OCT-measured central subfield thickness was 491 microns, mean area of retinal thickening in the macular grid on color photography was 7.5 DA, and the mean area of fluorescein leakage was 6.1 DA.
Conclusions: Differences observed in baseline visual acuity, OCT-measured retinal thickness, area of retinal thickening on color photography, and area of fluorescein leakage support the evaluation of CRVO and BRVO in separate trials.
Financial disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors has a financial interest in the subject matter of this article.
Similar articles
-
Baseline predictors of visual acuity and retinal thickness outcomes in patients with retinal vein occlusion: Standard Care Versus COrticosteroid for REtinal Vein Occlusion Study report 10.Ophthalmology. 2011 Feb;118(2):345-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.034. Ophthalmology. 2011. PMID: 20926135 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
SCORE Study report 1: baseline associations between central retinal thickness and visual acuity in patients with retinal vein occlusion.Ophthalmology. 2009 Mar;116(3):504-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.017. Epub 2009 Jan 22. Ophthalmology. 2009. PMID: 19167078 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone with standard care to treat vision loss associated with macular Edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: the Standard Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) study report 6.Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;127(9):1115-28. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.233. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009. PMID: 19752420 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 7;7(7):CD009510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009510.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32633861 Free PMC article.
-
Management of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: an evidence-based.Adv Ther. 2011 Jan;28(1):40-50. doi: 10.1007/s12325-010-0088-4. Epub 2010 Dec 9. Adv Ther. 2011. PMID: 21153510 Review.
Cited by
-
The mean platelet volume in patients with retinal vein occlusion.J Ophthalmol. 2013;2013:236371. doi: 10.1155/2013/236371. Epub 2013 May 28. J Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 23781328 Free PMC article.
-
Baseline Factors Associated With 6-Month Visual Acuity and Retinal Thickness Outcomes in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion: SCORE2 Study Report 4.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 1;135(6):639-649. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1141. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28492860 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Drug treatment of macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: a network meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 23;4(7):e005292. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005292. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 25056974 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of intravitreal therapy in macular edema due to branch and central retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review.PLoS One. 2013 Oct 25;8(10):e78538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078538. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24205253 Free PMC article.
-
Baseline characteristics and response to treatment of participants with hemiretinal compared with branch retinal or central retinal vein occlusion in the standard care vs corticosteroid for retinal vein occlusion (SCORE) study: SCORE study report 14.Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Dec;130(12):1517-24. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2728. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 23229691 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group. Argon laser photocoagulation for macular edema in branch vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;98:271–82. - PubMed
-
- Central Vein Occlusion Study Group. Baseline and early natural history report. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:1087–95. - PubMed
-
- Mitchell P, Smith W, Chang A. Prevalence and associations of retinal vein occlusion in Australia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:1243–7. - PubMed
-
- Evaluation of grid pattern photocoagulation for macular edema in central vein occlusion: the Central Vein Occlusion Study Group M report. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1425–33. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical