Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Oct;14(5):471-6.
doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e32832fb9e1.

Donor selection and management

Affiliations
Review

Donor selection and management

Gregory I Snell et al. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The scarcity of suitable donor organs continues to limit lung transplantation, resulting in long waiting times and significant mortality for those patients listed for transplant. Strategies to expand the donor pool can substantially lift donor lung utilization rates from historically low levels of less than 20% to rates greater than 50%. This article reviews recent developments in the selection, assessment and management of the potential lung donor that aim to increase donor organ use.

Recent findings: Close adherence to the originally published lung transplant donor acceptability criteria has historically restricted the number of donor lungs available for transplant. Important advances that aim to increase donor lung utilization include the use of donation after cardiac death lungs, cut-down lungs and expanded criteria lungs. Emerging diagnostic tools that predict how donor lungs will function after transplant are likely to facilitate selection of appropriate donor lungs significantly in the future.

Summary: Optimal donor management should aim to maximize lung donation through aggressive donor management and consideration of the complete and expanded donor pool. However, long-term studies are required to validate such an approach and to confirm that long-term outcomes are not being compromised by the use of both traditional and nontraditional organ donors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • Selection and management of the lung donor.
    Snell GI, Westall GP. Snell GI, et al. Clin Chest Med. 2011 Jun;32(2):223-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Mar 22. Clin Chest Med. 2011. PMID: 21511085 Review.
  • Donor selection and management.
    Snell GI, Paraskeva M, Westall GP. Snell GI, et al. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun;34(3):361-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1348464. Epub 2013 Jul 2. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23821510 Review.
  • Cadaveric donor selection and management.
    Studer SM, Orens JB. Studer SM, et al. Respir Care Clin N Am. 2004 Dec;10(4):459-71. doi: 10.1016/j.rcc.2004.06.006. Respir Care Clin N Am. 2004. PMID: 15585178 Review.
  • Cadaveric donor selection and management.
    Studer SM, Orens JB. Studer SM, et al. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Oct;27(5):492-500. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-954607. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2006. PMID: 17072797 Review.
  • Lung donor selection and management.
    Van Raemdonck D, Neyrinck A, Verleden GM, Dupont L, Coosemans W, Decaluwé H, Decker G, De Leyn P, Nafteux P, Lerut T. Van Raemdonck D, et al. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009 Jan 15;6(1):28-38. doi: 10.1513/pats.200808-098GO. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009. PMID: 19131528 Review.

Cited by

Publication types