Sharps injury reporting amongst surgeons
- PMID: 19622260
- PMCID: PMC2758447
- DOI: 10.1308/003588409X432194
Sharps injury reporting amongst surgeons
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of sharps injury reporting amongst surgeons.
Subjects and methods: A total of 164 surgeons completed a questionnaire on the reporting of sharps injuries, on the reasons for not reporting and their practise of universal precautions.
Results: Out of 164 surgeons, only 25.8% had reported all their injuries, 22.5% had reported some and 51.7% had reported none. The top three reasons for not reporting their injuries included perception of low risk of transmission, not being concerned and no time. Of the respondents, 15.9% practised all three universal precautions of double-gloving, face shields and hands-free technique.
Conclusions: We showed that despite local trust adherence to Department of Health policy, sharps injury reporting rates are inadequate. Further investment into healthcare worker education as well as a facilitation of the process of reporting may be necessary to improve reporting rates.
References
-
- Trim JC, Elliott TS. A review of sharps injuries and preventative strategies. J Hosp Infect. 2003;53:237–42. - PubMed
-
- The National Audit Office. A safer place to work – improving the management of health and safety risks to staff in NHS trusts. London: NAO; 2003. < http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/nao_reports/02-03/0203623.pdf>.
-
- Watterson L. Monitoring sharps injuries: EPINet surveillance results. Nurs Stand. 2004;19:33–8. - PubMed
-
- Health Protection Agency. Press release 2005 < http://www.hpa.org.uk/hpa/news/articles/press_releases/2005/050125_needl...>.
-
- Panlilio AL, Foy DR, Edwards JR, Bell DM, Welch BA, et al. Blood contacts during surgical procedures. JAMA. 1991;265:1533–7. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
