Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):211-216.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ae9b4a.

Blunt needles for the reduction of needlestick injuries during cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial

Scott Sullivan  1 , Bridget Williamson, Lisa K Wilson, Jeffrey E Korte, David Soper
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Blunt needles for the reduction of needlestick injuries during cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial

Scott Sullivan et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the rate of glove perforation as a proxy for needlestick injuries between blunt and sharp needles used during cesarean-delivery closure and to survey physician satisfaction with blunt needles.

Methods: Patients requiring cesarean delivery were assigned randomly to receive closure with either blunt (study group) or sharp needles (control group). Patient demographics, operator experience, and other clinical variables were collected. Physicians reported any percutaneous injuries and were surveyed regarding satisfaction with the assigned needles. Glove perforation was determined using a validated water-test method. Differences between patient groups were tested using chi and Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Student t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.

Results: There were 194 patients enrolled in the trial: 97 in the control group and 97 in the study group. There were no statistical differences between groups in patient demographics. There were no differences between groups in clinical variables, type of cesarean delivery, or experience level of the surgeon. There was a significant reduction in total glove perforation rate for the primary surgeon with blunt needles (7.2%) compared with sharp needles (17.5%) (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.89) as well as for the assistant surgeon (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.71). There was poor correlation between reported perforations and those detected by water test (R=0.3). Physicians reported that they were not as satisfied with blunt needles compared with sharp needles (P=.001).

Conclusion: There was a significant decrease in the rate of glove perforation for surgeons and assistants performing cesarean-delivery closure with blunt needles. Assistant surgeons had the greatest reduction in glove perforations. However, physicians reported decreased satisfaction performing the surgery with blunt needles.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00844636

Level of evidence: I.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Martin JA, Kung HC, Matthews TJ, Hoyert DL, Strobino DM, Guyer B, et al. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2006. Pediatrics 2008;121:788–801.
    1. Rogers B, Goodno L. Evaluation of interventions to prevent needlestick injuries in health care occupations. Am J Prev Med 2000;18:90–8.
    1. Nordkam RA, Bluyssen SJ, van Goor H. Randomized clinical trial comparing blunt tapered and standard needles in closing abdominal fascia. World J Surg 2005;29:441–5.
    1. Catanzarite V, Byrd K, McNamara M, Bombard A. Preventing needlestick injuries in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1399–403.
    1. Trim JC, Elliott TS. A review of sharps injuries and preventative strategies. J Hosp Infect 2003;53:237–42.

Publication types

Associated data