Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Aug;116(9):1185-95.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02216.x.

Randomised placebo-controlled trial of outpatient (at home) cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) prior to induction of labour--clinical trial with analyses of efficacy and acceptability. The IMOP study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomised placebo-controlled trial of outpatient (at home) cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) prior to induction of labour--clinical trial with analyses of efficacy and acceptability. The IMOP study

S S Bollapragada et al. BJOG. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether isosorbide mononitrate (IMN), self-administered vaginally by women at home, improves the process of induction of labour.

Design: Randomised double blind placebo-controlled trial.

Setting: Large UK maternity hospital.

Population or sample: Nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation > or = 37 weeks gestation, requiring cervical ripening prior to induction of labour.

Methods: IMN (n = 177) or placebo (n = 173) self-administered vaginally at home at 48, 32 and 16 hours prior to the scheduled time of admission for induction.

Main outcome measures: Admission to delivery interval and women's experience of induction of labour.

Results: IMN did not shorten the admission to delivery interval as compared with placebo [mean difference of -1.6 hours (95% CI -5.1,1.9, P = 0.37)], despite being more effective than placebo in inducing a change in Bishop score [mean difference of 0.65 (95% CI 0.14,1.17, P = 0.013)]. While both groups found the overall experience of home treatment to be positive, (mean score of 3.8/10 +/- 2.3/10 for the IMN group, where 1 = extremely good and 10 = not at all good) women in the placebo group found it marginally more positive than those in the IMN group (just over half a unit on a 10-point scale, P = 0.043). There were no differences between the groups in the pain or anxiety experienced or willingness to take the treatment in a subsequent pregnancy.

Conclusions: IMN self-administered vaginally at home does not shorten admission to delivery interval despite a significant effect on cervical ripeness assessed using the Bishop score. However, women report positive views on cervical ripening at home, and the setting deserves further investigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources