Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul 22:9:32.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-32.

Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines - a clinical quality improvement

Affiliations

Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines - a clinical quality improvement

Julie Victoria Holm Tveit et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Erratum in

  • BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:49

Abstract

Background: Women experiencing decreased fetal movements (DFM) are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, including stillbirth. Fourteen delivery units in Norway registered all cases of DFM in a population-based quality assessment. We found that information to women and management of DFM varied significantly between hospitals. We intended to examine two cohorts of women with DFM before and during two consensus-based interventions aiming to improve care through: 1) written information to women about fetal activity and DFM, including an invitation to monitor fetal movements, 2) guidelines for management of DFM for health-care professionals.

Methods: All singleton third trimester pregnancies presenting with a perception of DFM were registered, and outcomes collected independently at all 14 hospitals. The quality assessment period included April 2005 through October 2005, and the two interventions were implemented from November 2005 through March 2007. The baseline versus intervention cohorts included: 19,407 versus 46,143 births and 1215 versus 3038 women with DFM, respectively.

Results: Reports of DFM did not increase during the intervention. The stillbirth rate among women with DFM fell during the intervention: 4.2% vs. 2.4%, (OR 0.51 95% CI 0.32-0.81), and 3.0/1000 versus 2.0/1000 in the overall study population (OR 0.67 95% CI 0.48-0.93). There was no increase in the rates of preterm births, fetal growth restriction, transfers to neonatal care or severe neonatal depression among women with DFM during the intervention. The use of ultrasound in management increased, while additional follow up visits and admissions for induction were reduced.

Conclusion: Improved management of DFM and uniform information to women is associated with fewer stillbirths.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile. Trial profile of total births and reports of decreased fetal movements before and during the intervention *All deaths, irrespective of how they were initially identified, were included in analyses of mortality in the total population.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Stillbirth rates in pregnancies presenting decreased fetal movements. Statistical process control chart presenting the monthly stillbirth rates and means during the baseline quality assessment period and the intervention period. The arrow indicates the time (seventh month of intervention) at which a significant change was documented during the intervention.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Frøen JF. A kick from within – fetal movement counting and the cancelled progress in antenatal care. J Perinat Med. 2004;32:13–24. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2004.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frøen JF, Saastad E, Tveit JV, Børdahl PE, Stray-Pedersen B. [Clinical practice variation in reduced fetal movements] Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2005;125:2631–2634. - PubMed
    1. Sergent F, Lefevre A, Verspyck E, Marpeau L. [Decreased fetal movements in the third trimester: what to do?] Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2005;33:861–869. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2005.07.041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frøen JF, Arnestad M, Frey K, Vege Å, Saugstad OD, Stray-Pedersen B. Risk factors for sudden intrauterine unexplained death: Epidemiologic characteristics of singleton cases in Oslo, Norway, 1986–1995. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:694–702. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.110697. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heazell AE, Sumathi GM, Bhatti NR. What investigation is appropriate following maternal perception of reduced fetal movements? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25:648–650. doi: 10.1080/01443610500278303. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types