[Long distance interhospital transport. Accuracy of severity scoring system]
- PMID: 19624995
- DOI: 10.1016/s0210-5691(09)71755-3
[Long distance interhospital transport. Accuracy of severity scoring system]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the hospital mortality risk for patients transported from a regional hospital to its second-level reference hospital using several scoring systems: Rapid Acute Physiology Score (RAPS), Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), SAPS II and APACHE II.
Design and setting: Prospective observational study of patients transferred from the Sant Hospital in la Seu d'Urgell to the University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova in Lleida, at a distance of 132 km.
Patients: Consecutive cohort of 134 patients transferred between October 2005 and July 2007.
Main variables: Several data were collected, such as variables on demography, stay, severity score, diagnosis on admission, destination service and procedures, such as mechanical ventilation, inotropics, sedation, neuromuscular blockers and antiarrhythmics. Variable of result was hospital mortality.
Results: The average transfer time was 105 +/- 14 minutes; 31.6% of the patients were admitted to an ICU; 16 (11,9%) patients died during hospital stay. The APACHE II and SAPS II scores got significantly higher values in those patients who died. The RAPS and REMS scores showed no significant differences among dead and survivors. The higher the APACHE II and SAPS II scores, the higher the proportion of mortality. The RAPS and REMS scores did not prove to have that tendency. Area under ROC curve was higher for APACHE II (0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.89) and SAPS II (0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.89), compared to those of RAPS (0.59; 95% CI, 0.43-0.75) and REMS (0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.78).
Conclusions: The severity of illness measured with APACHE II and SAPS II is able to identify those patients with a higher predictive of mortality. It is a priority to have the right previous stabilization and the adequately trained team to provide care during the transfer, when facing lengthy journey times.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the rapid emergency medicine score and APACHE II in nonsurgical emergency department patients.Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Oct;10(10):1040-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00572.x. Acad Emerg Med. 2003. PMID: 14525735
-
Predictive accuracy and feasibility of risk stratification scores for 28-day mortality of patients with sepsis in an emergency department.Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;22(5):331-7. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000185. Eur J Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 25144398
-
Critical care in the emergency department: A physiologic assessment and outcome evaluation.Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Dec;7(12):1354-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00492.x. Acad Emerg Med. 2000. PMID: 11099425
-
Severity scores in respiratory intensive care: APACHE II predicted mortality better than SAPS II.Respir Care. 1995 Oct;40(10):1042-7. Respir Care. 1995. PMID: 10152703 Review.
-
The Value of Physiological Scoring Criteria in Predicting the In-Hospital Mortality of Acute Patients; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Sep 9;9(1):e60. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1274. eCollection 2021. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 34580658 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative study on the prognosis of critical ill patients transferred from another island compared to those patients transferred from emergency department to intensive care unit.Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2015 Apr-Jun;5(2):85-8. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.158393. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2015. PMID: 26157650 Free PMC article.
-
A transfer triage tool for COVID-19 mass critical care surges.Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 5;15(1):11726. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95337-8. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40188194 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources