Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug 15;183(4):2554-64.
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901276. Epub 2009 Jul 22.

Structural basis of the CD8 alpha beta/MHC class I interaction: focused recognition orients CD8 beta to a T cell proximal position

Affiliations

Structural basis of the CD8 alpha beta/MHC class I interaction: focused recognition orients CD8 beta to a T cell proximal position

Rui Wang et al. J Immunol. .

Abstract

In the immune system, B cells, dendritic cells, NK cells, and T lymphocytes all respond to signals received via ligand binding to receptors and coreceptors. Although the specificity of T cell recognition is determined by the interaction of T cell receptors with MHC/peptide complexes, the development of T cells in the thymus and their sensitivity to Ag are also dependent on coreceptor molecules CD8 (for MHC class I (MHCI)) and CD4 (for MHCII). The CD8alphabeta heterodimer is a potent coreceptor for T cell activation, but efforts to understand its function fully have been hampered by ignorance of the structural details of its interactions with MHCI. In this study we describe the structure of CD8alphabeta in complex with the murine MHCI molecule H-2D(d) at 2.6 A resolution. The focus of the CD8alphabeta interaction is the acidic loop (residues 222-228) of the alpha3 domain of H-2D(d). The beta subunit occupies a T cell membrane proximal position, defining the relative positions of the CD8alpha and CD8beta subunits. Unlike the CD8alphaalpha homodimer, CD8alphabeta does not contact the MHCI alpha(2)- or beta(2)-microglobulin domains. Movements of the CD8alpha CDR2 and CD8beta CDR1 and CDR2 loops as well as the flexibility of the H-2D(d) CD loop facilitate the monovalent interaction. The structure resolves inconclusive data on the topology of the CD8alphabeta/MHCI interaction, indicates that CD8beta is crucial in orienting the CD8alphabeta heterodimer, provides a framework for understanding the mechanistic role of CD8alphabeta in lymphoid cell signaling, and offers a tangible context for design of structurally altered coreceptors for tumor and viral immunotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Binding of MHC/peptide complexes to CD8αα and CD8αβ. CD8αα and CD8αβ were coupled to the dextran surface of a CM5 biosensor chip by standard amine coupling chemistry, and increasing concentrations (1μM, 2μM, 5μM, 10μM, 20μM) of either H-2Dd or H-2Kb were sequentially injected over each surface. The zero time point corresponds to the start of the injection of the soluble analyte. Buffer washout was initiated at 240 seconds. Background binding to a mock-coupled surface was subtracted. The peptides bound to H-2Dd and H-2Kb are P18-I10 (RGPGRAFVTI) and IFSK8 (ISFKFDHL) respectively. Calculated KD values based on a simple monovalent interaction model, AB <--->A + B, were determined from both kinetics and steady-state evaluation of global curve fits using BIAeval 3.2. Data points collected at 5 Hz are plotted in color and corresponding curve fits are in black.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structure of CD8αβ /H-2Dd/P18I10 complex. Graphics representation of the CD8αβ/H-2Dd/P18I10 complex is shown in ribbon representation (A) colored as H-2Dd heavy chain (green), β2m light chain (magenta), bound P18I10 peptide (light blue), CD8α (orange), and CD8β (slate). Panel (B) shows a rotation about the y axis of about 90°, with the MHC complex in a surface representation, and the CD8αβ heterodimer as ribbons. Panel (C) shows a close-up of the H-2Dd residues that contact CD8. Residues that contact the CD8α chain are shown in orange, and those that contact CD8β are in slate. The single residue, Q226, that contacts both CD8 chains is yellow. Panel (D) is a rotation of (A) of about -90°, with the CD8 heterodimer in a surface representation, and the MHC in ribbons. Panel (E) reveals the residues of CD8 that contact the MHC, colored in green.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of CD8αβ/H-2Dd complex to other CD8/MHC complexes. Structures of CD8αα/H-2Kb (1BQH) (48), CD8αα/TL (1NEZ) (81), and CD8αα/HLA-A2 (1AKJ) (42) were each superposed on CD8αβ/H-2Dd, and are illustrated here as ribbon diagrams in the same orientation. (A) shows ribbon diagram of CD8αβ/H-2Dd; (B) CD8αα/H-2Kb; (C) CD8αα/TL; (D) CD8αα/HLA-A2. Panel E illustrates the footprint of CD8αβ on H-2Dd/β2m, with the residues contacting CD8β colored blue, those contacting CD8α colored orange, and the single residue (Q226) contacted by both in yellow. Panel F shows the footprint of CD8αα on H-2Kb/β2m, with the residues contacting CD8α1 in blue, those contacting CD8α2 in orange and those contacting both CD8α subunits in yellow.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Close-up examination of residues of the CD8αβ/H-2Dd interface. Panel (A) is a side-by-side stereo view of the intimate interaction of Gln226 of the MHC heavy chain with residues of both chains of CD8. Panel (B) shows Gln226 of H-2Dd and the corresponding density map contoured at 1.5 σ, illustrating the proximity to CD8α Ser37 and CD8β Pro102. Panel (D) shows residues 225 to 227 of H-2Dd of the CD8αβ/H-2Dd complex (green) superposed on the same residues of the unliganded 1.7 Å H-2Dd structure (purple). Movements of the Nε of Gln226 of 3.8 Å and of the Oε1 (4.3 Å) of Glu227 are indicated.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of bound and free CD8αβ. (A) Coordinates of mouse CD8αβ free (2ATP(49)) were superposed onto the CD8αβ heterodimer in the complex. CD8α and CD8β in the bound complex are orange and slate respectively, and in the unbound state are yellow and pink. Loop designations are shown in a structure based sequence alignment in Fig. S2. (B) The CDR loops, as indicated, are shown in tube representation, and (C) shows CDR loops in the context of the H-2Dd structure. (D) shows an edited close-up of the interactions between CD8β CDR1 Lys27 liganded (slate) and H-2Dd (green). (E) shows the movement of the CD8α CDR2 loop, focused on residue H60.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Structure-based sequence alignment of CD8α, CD8β, and the α3 domain of MHCI. The indicated sequences were aligned as described (83). (A) CD8α alignment. CD8α residues that contact or form hydrogen bonds to MHCI heavy chain are shown as black triangles. Green filled circles are potential N-asparaginyl-glycosylation sites. (B) CD8β alignment. CD8β residues that contact H-2Dd in the CD8αβ/H-2Dd complex are shown as black filled triangles. Green filled circles are potential glycosylation sites. (C) MHCI α3 domain alignment. Indicated residues are: filled circles, H-2Dd α3 domain residues of CD8αβ/H-2Dd that contact CD8α; filled triangles, H-2Dd α3 domain residues of CD8αβ/H-2Dd that contact CD8β; and filled square, H-2Dd α3 domain residue of CD8αβ/H-2Dd that contacts both CD8α and CD8β.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Schematic illustration of distance of CD8αβ from apposed T cell, based on superposition of TCR/MHC complex onto CD8αβ/MHCI complex. Coordinates of the H-2Dd moiety of a P18I10-specific TCR in complex with H-2Dd/β2m/P18I10 determined to 2.0 Å resolution (K.N. and D.H.M., unpublished data) were superposed on the H-2Dd of the CD8αβ/H-2Dd complex using PyMOL (http://www.pymol.org). Stalk regions of CD8α and β as well as transmembrane regions of the indicated chains are shown as dashed lines.

References

    1. Laugel B, van den Berg HA, Gostick E, Cole DK, Wooldridge L, Boulter J, Milicic A, Price DA, Sewell AK. Different T cell receptor affinity thresholds and CD8 coreceptor dependence govern cytotoxic T lymphocyte activation and tetramer binding properties. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:23799–23810. - PubMed
    1. Singer A, Bosselut R. CD4/CD8 coreceptors in thymocyte development, selection, and lineage commitment: analysis of the CD4/CD8 lineage decision. Adv Immunol. 2004;83:91–131. - PubMed
    1. Zamoyska R. CD4 and CD8: modulators of T-cell receptor recognition of antigen and of immune responses? Curr Opin Immunol. 1998;10:82–87. - PubMed
    1. Chan IT, Limmer A, Louie MC, Bullock ED, Fung-Leung WP, Mak TW, Loh DY. Thymic selection of cytotoxic T cells independent of CD8 alpha-Lck association. Science. 1993;261:1581–1584. - PubMed
    1. Xu C, Gagnon E, Call ME, Schnell JR, Schwieters CD, Carman CV, Chou JJ, Wucherpfennig KW. Regulation of T cell receptor activation by dynamic membrane binding of the CD3epsilon cytoplasmic tyrosine-based motif. Cell. 2008;135:702–713. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data