Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep;105(39):657-62.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0657. Epub 2008 Sep 26.

Susceptible, intermediate, and resistant - the intensity of antibiotic action

Susceptible, intermediate, and resistant - the intensity of antibiotic action

Arne Rodloff et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: To date, the resistance of infectious agents has been assessed by widely varying criteria in different countries. Therefore, published data on resistance often cannot be meaningfully compared. In Germany, different laboratories can potentially report different results for identical microorganisms, since there is no uniform system for categorization. This situation is unsatisfactory.

Methods: Selective literature review and evaluation of committee reports.

Results: The new ISO standard 20776 for determination of the resistance of infectious agents and the harmonized evaluation system of the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases provide a new basis for susceptibility testing. The categorization of infectious agents as "susceptible," "intermediate," or "resistant" to particular antibiotics will become more reliable and will be consistent throughout Europe.

Discussion: For a number of antibiotics, the criteria for evaluation of infectious agents as "susceptible," "intermediate", or "resistant" will change. Comparability with earlier resistance data will be compromised. However, the new evaluation criteria reflect current knowledge on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial substances.

Keywords: antibiotic; bacteriological testing; in-vitro diagnostic agent; pharmakokinetics; resistance testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
The distribution of MIC values of E. coli isolates cultured from patient specimens at the Leipzig University Clinic in 2006 (n = 2224). The EUCAST ratings (which have already been published for this data set) are indicated by colored borders: red = r, yellow = i, green = s. Bimodal distributions can be seen, in particular, with the penicillins (e.g., wild types for piperacillin up to MIC = 8 mg/L, resistant strains starting at MIC = 16 mg/L), cotrimoxazole (wild types up to MIC = 8 mg/L, resistant strains starting at MIC = 128 mg/L), and the quinolones (e.g., wild types for ciprofloxacin up to MIC = 0.25 mg/L, strains with clinically relevant resistance mechanisms starting at MIC = 4 mg/L).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rello J, Diaz E. Pneumonia in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:2544–2551. - PubMed
    1. Beardsley JR, Williamson JC, Johnson JW, Ohl CA, Karchmer TB, Bowton DL. Using local microbiologic data to develop institution-specific guidelines for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Chest. 2006;130:787–793. - PubMed
    1. Kiem S, Schentag JJ. Relationship of minimal inhibitory concentration and bactericidal activity to efficacy of antibiotics for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;27:51–67. - PubMed
    1. Lichtenstein SJ, Wagner RS, Jamison T, Bell B, Stroman DW. Speed of bacterial kill with a fluoroquinolone compared with nonfluoroquinolones: clinical implications and a review of kinetics of kill studies. Adv Ther. 2007;24:1098–1111. - PubMed
    1. Gould IM. Determinants of response to antibiotic therapy. J Chemother. 1998;10:347–353. - PubMed