Optimization and validation of radionuclide angiography phase analysis parameters for quantification of mechanical dyssynchrony
- PMID: 19626384
- DOI: 10.1007/s12350-009-9119-4
Optimization and validation of radionuclide angiography phase analysis parameters for quantification of mechanical dyssynchrony
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has the potential to improve the outcome of patients suffering from mechanical dyssynchrony and heart failure. It has been suggested that accurate quantification of baseline extent of mechanical dyssynchrony may lead to pre-selection of patients likely to respond to CRT. The standard deviation from a phase histogram (phaseSD), synchrony (S) and entropy (E) are parameters obtained from phase analysis of planar radionuclide angiography (RNA) that may provide an accurate means of assessing mechanical dyssynchrony. In this paper, the ability of phaseSD, S, and E to detect mechanical dyssynchrony was investigated and optimal values for image smoothing, histogram noise thresholding, and bin size were defined. Finally, the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the methodology was assessed.
Methods: PhaseSD, S, and E were calculated for 37 normal subjects (LVEF > 50%, end-diastolic volume < 120 mL, end-systolic volume < 60 mL, QRS < 120 ms, and normal wall motion) and 53 patients with mechanical dyssynchrony (LVEF < 30%, QRS > 120 ms, and typical LBBB). Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curves were created and the area under the curve (AUC), for each parameter, was determined using three different imaging filters (no filter and an order 5 Hann filter with cut-off of 5/50 and 10/50). The AUC was also determined using histogram threshold values varying between 0% and 50% (of the max amplitude value). Finally, AUC for E was determined for bins sizes varying between 1 degrees and 20 degrees . Inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated at optimal imaging values.
Results: No smoothing was found to maximize the AUC. The AUC was independent of histogram threshold value. However, a value of 20% provided optimal visualization of the phase image. The AUC was also independent of bin size. At the optimal imaging values, the sensitivity and specificity for all parameters for detection of mechanical dyssynchrony was measured to be 89-100%. Inter- and intra-observer correlation coefficients >0.99 were found for phaseSD, S and E.
Conclusions: Optimized planar RNA phase analysis parameters, phaseSD, S, and E, were able to detect mechanical dyssynchrony with low inter- and intra-observer variability. Studies assessing the ability of these parameters to predict CRT outcome are required.
Comment in
-
Imaging synchrony.J Nucl Cardiol. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):846-8. doi: 10.1007/s12350-009-9151-4. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19798545 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Alternative methods for the assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Aug;28(6):1385-94. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9963-6. Epub 2011 Oct 18. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012. PMID: 22005893
-
Use of phase analysis of gated SPECT perfusion imaging to quantify dyssynchrony in patients with mild-to-moderate left ventricular dysfunction.J Nucl Cardiol. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):888-94. doi: 10.1007/s12350-009-9136-3. Epub 2009 Aug 19. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19690935 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging and tissue Doppler imaging: comparison between QGS and ECTb software packages.J Nucl Cardiol. 2014 Dec;21(6):1062-71. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-9941-1. Epub 2014 Jul 22. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25047867
-
Measuring left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony from ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.Minerva Cardioangiol. 2008 Apr;56(2):227-35. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2008. PMID: 18319701 Review.
-
Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.J Nucl Cardiol. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):127-36. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.11.004. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 18242490 Review.
Cited by
-
Cardiac dyssynchrony: we have the tools. It is time to use them.J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Jun;19(3):420-3. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9526-9. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22362266 No abstract available.
-
Evaluation of baseline contractile reserve vs dyssynchrony as a predictor of functional improvement and long term outcome after resynchronization pacing therapy: a radionuclide stress study.J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Feb;19(1):53-62. doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9421-9. Epub 2011 Jul 20. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 21769704
-
Single-photon cardiac imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices.J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Apr;29(2):633-641. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02436-2. Epub 2020 Nov 25. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 33241474 Review.
-
SPECT blood pool phase analysis can accurately and reproducibly quantify mechanical dyssynchrony.J Nucl Cardiol. 2010 Oct;17(5):803-10. doi: 10.1007/s12350-010-9231-5. Epub 2010 Apr 29. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20428986
-
Relation of left-ventricular dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated SPECT images and cardiovascular events in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators.J Nucl Cardiol. 2010 Jun;17(3):398-404. doi: 10.1007/s12350-009-9169-7. Epub 2010 Mar 19. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20300907
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials