Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Aug;80(4):445-50.
doi: 10.3109/17453670903170505.

Impact of instrumentation in lumbar spinal fusion in elderly patients: 71 patients followed for 2-7 years

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Impact of instrumentation in lumbar spinal fusion in elderly patients: 71 patients followed for 2-7 years

Thomas Andersen et al. Acta Orthop. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

Background and purpose: An increasing number of lumbar fusions are performed using allograft to avoid donor-site pain. In elderly patients, fusion potential is reduced and the patient may need supplementary stability to achieve a solid fusion if allograft is used. We investigated the effect of instrumentation in lumbar spinal fusion performed with fresh frozen allograft in elderly patients.

Methods: 94 patients, mean age 70 (60-88) years, who underwent posterolateral spinal fusion either non-instrumented (51 patients) or instrumented (43 patients) were followed for 2-7 years. Functional outcome was assessed with the Dallas pain questionnaire (DPQ), the low back pain rating scale pain index (LBPRS), and SF-36. Fusion was assessed using plain radiographs.

Results: Instrumented patients had statistically significantly better outcome scores in 6 of 7 parameters. Fusion rate was higher in the instrumented group (81% vs. 68%, p = 0.1). Solid fusion was associated with a better functional outcome at follow-up (significant in 2 of 7 parameters). 15 patients (6 in the non-instrumented group and 9 in the instrumented group) had repeated lumbar surgery after their initial fusion procedure. Functional outcome was poorer in the group with additional spine surgeries (significant in 4 of 7 parameters).

Interpretation: Superior outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion in elderly patients can be achieved by use of instrumentation in selected patients. Outcome was better in patients in which a solid fusion was obtained. Instrumentation was associated with a larger number of additional surgeries, which resulted in a lesser degree of improvement. Instrumentation should not be discarded just because of the age of the patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Dallas pain questionnaire (DPQ) scores according to follow-up time point in the 2 study groups.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Long-term follow-up scores for all outcome parameters according to study group. PCS: Physical component summary scale; MCS: Mental component summary scale.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Outcome score at long-term follow-up according to whether the patient had additional spine surgery after the initial fusion procedure.

References

    1. An HS, Lynch K, Toth J. Prospective comparison of autograft vs. allograft for adult posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: differences among freeze-dried, frozen, and mixed grafts. J Spinal Disord. 1995;8:131–5. - PubMed
    1. Andersen T, Videbaek TS, Hansen ES, Bunger C, Christensen FB. The positive effect of posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion is preserved at long-term follow-up: a RCT with 11-13 year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:272–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG, Bucknell AL, Davino NA. Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop. 1996;(329):300–9. - PubMed
    1. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine. 2005;30:936–43. - PubMed
    1. Brodsky AE, Kovalsky ES, Khalil MA. Correlation of radiologic assessment of lumbar spine fusions with surgical exploration. Spine. 1991;16:S261–5. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources