Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul 23:6:113.
doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-6-113.

Genetic diversity of the E protein of dengue type 3 virus

Affiliations

Genetic diversity of the E protein of dengue type 3 virus

Alberto A Amarilla et al. Virol J. .

Abstract

Background: Dengue is the most important arbovirus disease in tropical and subtropical countries. The viral envelope (E) protein is responsible for cell receptor binding and is the main target of neutralizing antibodies. The aim of this study was to analyze the diversity of the E protein gene of DENV-3. E protein gene sequences of 20 new viruses isolated in Ribeirao Preto, Brazil, and 427 sequences retrieved from GenBank were aligned for diversity and phylogenetic analysis.

Results: Comparison of the E protein gene sequences revealed the presence of 47 variable sites distributed in the protein; most of those amino acids changes are located on the viral surface. The phylogenetic analysis showed the distribution of DENV-3 in four genotypes. Genotypes I, II and III revealed internal groups that we have called lineages and sub-lineages. All amino acids that characterize a group (genotype, lineage, or sub-lineage) are located in the 47 variable sites of the E protein.

Conclusion: Our results provide information about the most frequent amino acid changes and diversity of the E protein of DENV-3.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
DENV-3 phylogenetic tree based on the E gene sequences. The three was constructed using the method of Neighbor-joining with 1000 bootstrap replications. The genotypes are labeled according to the scheme of Lanciotti (1994) and the amino acid changes distinguishing each genotype are shown on the tree. Protein E gene sequences of DENV-1, DENV-2 and DENV-4 were used as outgroup. Branch lengths are proportional to percentage of divergence. Tamura Nei (TrN+I+G) nucleotide substitution model was used with a proportion of invariable sites (I) of 0.3305 and gamma distribution (G) of 0.9911. Bootstrap support values are shown for key nodes only.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Genotype I phylogenetic tree constructed using the method of Neighbor-joining with 1000 bootstrap replications. Sequences of each genotype II, III and IV were used as outgroup. Branch lengths are proportional to percentage divergence. Tamura Nei (TrN+I+G) nucleotide substitution model was used with a proportion of invariable sites (I) of 0.5420 and gamma distribution (G) of 2.6122. The lineage and sub-lineages are marked. Amino acids changes are indicated on the tree. Bootstrap support values are shown for key nodes only.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Genotype II phylogenetic tree constructed using the method of Neighbor-joining with 1000 bootstrap replications. Sequences of each genotype I, III and IV were used as outgroup. Branch lengths are proportional to percentage divergence. Tamura Nei (TrN+I+G) nucleotide substitution model was used with a proportion of invariable sites (I) of 0.5041 and gamma distribution (G) of 1.3902. The lineage and sub-lineages are marked. Amino acids changes are indicated on the tree. Bootstrap support values are shown for key nodes only.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Genotype III phylogenetic tree constructed using the method of Neighbor-joining with 1000 bootstrap replications. Some viruses of each genotype I, II and IV were used as outgroup. Branch lengths are proportional to percentage divergence. Tamura Nei (TrN+G) nucleotide substitution model was used with gamma distribution (G) of 0.2796. The Lineage and Sub-lineages are marked. Amino acids changes are indicated on the tree. Bootstrap support values are shown for key nodes only.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO World Health Organization. Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever. Fact Sheet No. 117. Geneva. 2002.
    1. Dos Santos HWG, Poloni T, Souza KP, Muller VDM, Tremeschin F, Nali LC, Fantinatti LR, Amarilla AA, Castro HLA, Nunes MR, et al. A simple one-step real-time RT-PCR for diagnosis of dengue virus infection. Journal of Medical Virology. 2008;80:1426–1433. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21203. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Henchal E, Putnak J. The dengue viruses. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990;3:376–396. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mackenzie J, Gubler D, Petersen L. Emerging flaviviruses: the spread and resurgence of Japanese encephalitis, West Nile and dengue viruses. Nat Med. 2004;10:S98–109. doi: 10.1038/nm1144. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson R, King A, Innis B. Correlation of E protein binding with cell susceptibility to dengue 4 virus infection. J Gen Virol. 1992;73:2155–2159. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-73-8-2155. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances