Drug-eluting stents and the use of percutaneous coronary intervention among patients with class I indications for coronary artery bypass surgery undergoing index revascularization: analysis from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry)
- PMID: 19628183
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.001
Drug-eluting stents and the use of percutaneous coronary intervention among patients with class I indications for coronary artery bypass surgery undergoing index revascularization: analysis from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry)
Abstract
Objectives: Our purpose was to evaluate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) attempt rates in patients with class I indications for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery after the introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES).
Background: In patients with severe, multivessel coronary disease, CABG has historically been recommended over PCI. Practice guidelines for CABG were last updated before the emergence of data on DES efficacy.
Methods: We analyzed 265,028 procedures from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) meeting American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class I indications for surgical revascularization. Temporal trends in PCI attempt rates were analyzed during 3 consecutive time periods: pre-DES (before April 1, 2003), DES diffusion (April 1, 2003 to December 31, 2004), and DES (January 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006).
Results: The attempted rate of PCI in patients with class I indications for CABG increased over the 3 time periods (pre-DES: 29.4%, DES diffusion: 33.4%, and DES era: 34.7%, p < 0.001). In a hierarchical multivariable logistic model adjusting for patient and PCI site characteristics, PCI attempts were more likely in the DES compared with pre-DES era (odds ratio: 1.44, 95% confidence interval: 1.40 to 1.48) and the DES diffusion era (odds ratio: 1.20, 95% confidence interval: 1.17 to 1.23). PCI attempt rates increased in all 3 time periods, although the average rate of increase during the DES era was 0.6% per quarter compared with 0.3% per quarter for both the DES diffusion and the pre-DES eras (p = 0.03).
Conclusions: DES use in clinical practice was associated with a significant overall increase in PCI to treat patients with class I indications for CABG. Long-term follow-up of this cohort of patients is warranted.
Comment in
-
Class I indications for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: what is the appropriate therapy for patients with multivessel coronary disease?JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul;2(7):622-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.009. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 19628184 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention in native arteries versus bypass grafts in prior coronary artery bypass grafting patients: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug;4(8):844-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.018. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011. PMID: 21851896
-
Frequency and predictors of drug-eluting stent use in saphenous vein bypass graft percutaneous coronary interventions: a report from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data CathPCI registry.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct;3(10):1068-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.07.009. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010. PMID: 20965466
-
Risk profile and 3-year outcomes from the SYNTAX percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting nested registries.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jun;5(6):618-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.02.013. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012. PMID: 22721656 Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis of 14 trials comparing bypass grafting vs drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Apr;24(4):344-54. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Dec 4. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014. PMID: 24373711 Review.
-
A meta-analysis of 3,773 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):739-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.020. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 19695542 Review.
Cited by
-
Meta-analysis of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass versus drug-eluting stents for isolated left anterior descending coronary artery disease.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):1837-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.028. Epub 2014 Mar 20. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014. PMID: 24755335 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Temporal Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Insights From the Washington Cardiac Care Outcomes Assessment Program.J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 2;9(11):e015317. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015317. Epub 2020 May 27. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020. PMID: 32456522 Free PMC article.
-
Previous percutaneous coronary intervention increases morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting.Surgery. 2012 Jul;152(1):5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Apr 11. Surgery. 2012. PMID: 22503323 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of prior percutaneous coronary intervention on the immediate and late outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting: systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart Lung Vessel. 2014;6(4):244-52. Heart Lung Vessel. 2014. PMID: 25436206 Free PMC article.
-
Follow-Up and Outcome after Coronary Bypass Surgery Preceded by Coronary Stent Implantation.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Sep;72(6):423-434. doi: 10.1055/a-2107-0481. Epub 2023 Jun 7. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024. PMID: 37286186 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous