Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2009 Dec;59(2):133-49.
doi: 10.1007/s11881-009-0027-8.

Measuring adult literacy students' reading skills using the Gray Oral Reading Test

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Measuring adult literacy students' reading skills using the Gray Oral Reading Test

Daphne Greenberg et al. Ann Dyslexia. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

There are not enough reading tests standardized on adults who have very low literacy skills, and therefore tests standardized on children are frequently administered. This study addressed the complexities and problems of using a test normed on children to measure the reading comprehension skills of 193 adults who read at approximately third through fifth grade reading grade equivalency levels. Findings are reported from an analysis of the administration of Form A of the Gray Oral Reading Tests-Fourth Edition (Wiederholt & Bryant, 2001a, b). Results indicated that educators and researchers should be very cautious when interpreting test results of adults who have difficulty reading when children's norm-referenced tests are administered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The number of total students, native English speaking students (nonESL), and students speaking English as a second language (ESL) with correct comprehension responses to each GORT story.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anastasi A, Urbina S. Psychological testing. Prentice Hall; Upper Saddle River, NJ: 1997.
    1. Bielinski J, Thurlow M, Minnema J, Scott J. How out-of-level testing affects the psychometric quality of test scores. National Center on Educational Outcomes; Minneapolis, MN: 2000. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED449174)
    1. Costenbader VK, Adams JW. A review of the psychometric features of the PIAT-R: Implications for the practitioner. Journal of School Psychology. 1991;29:219–228.
    1. Crocker L, Algina J. Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, Inc.; Orlando, FL: 1986.
    1. D'Amico-Samuels D. Perspectives on assessment from the New York City Adult Literacy Initiative: A critical issues paper. New York Literacy Assistance Center; 1991. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED357658)